Literature DB >> 18365888

Evaluation of the pDR-1200 real-time aerosol monitor.

Kaila Benton-Vitz1, John Volckens.   

Abstract

The objective of this research was to characterize the ability of the pDR-1200 real-time aerosol monitor to measure aerosols of varying size, composition, and origin. Particle aspiration and transmission efficiency was characterized at airflow rates of 2 L/min, 5 L/min, and 10 L/min in a wind tunnel in both static and orientation-averaged configurations. At 10 L/min, the particle cut point for 50% penetration of particles through the device (d(50)) was approximately 6 micro m, while at 2 L/min and 5 L/min the d(50) was significantly larger, about 9 micro m (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in particle penetration efficiency between facing-the-wind and orientation-averaged configurations (p(avg) = 0.66). The pDR-1200 response factor, which is defined as the ratio the time-averaged, monitor-reported concentration to a gravimetric filter concentration measured directly downstream of the sensing zone, was evaluated for four aerosol types: Arizona road dust, background ambient aerosol, environmental tobacco smoke, and diesel particulate matter. These aerosols, each of varying refractive index and particle size distribution, produced significant changes in the measured response factor (p < 0.01). The pDR-1200 both overestimated and underestimated (up to a factor of 7) the gravimetrically determined aerosol concentration. These discrepancies further reinforce the need to calibrate the instrument in situ for each aerosol of interest. Inter-instrument variability was generally low for co-located monitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18365888     DOI: 10.1080/15459620802009919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  7 in total

1.  Performance of Four Consumer-grade Air Pollution Measurement Devices in Different Residences.

Authors:  Sydonia Manibusan; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Aerosol Air Qual Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.063

2.  Variation in gravimetric correction factors for nephelometer-derived estimates of personal exposure to PM2.5.

Authors:  Jessica Tryner; Nicholas Good; Ander Wilson; Maggie L Clark; Jennifer L Peel; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 3.  New Methods for Personal Exposure Monitoring for Airborne Particles.

Authors:  Kirsten A Koehler; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

4.  Evaluation of a Low-Cost Aerosol Sensor to Assess Dust Concentrations in a Swine Building.

Authors:  Samuel Jones; T Renée Anthony; Sinan Sousan; Ralph Altmaier; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2016-03-04

5.  Exposure controls for nanomaterials at three manufacturing sites.

Authors:  William A Heitbrink; Li-Ming Lo; Kevin H Dunn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Within-microenvironment exposure to particulate matter and health effects in children with asthma: a pilot study utilizing real-time personal monitoring with GPS interface.

Authors:  Nathan Rabinovitch; Colby D Adams; Matthew Strand; Kirsten Koehler; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Development and evaluation of an ultrasonic personal aerosol sampler.

Authors:  J Volckens; C Quinn; D Leith; J Mehaffy; C S Henry; D Miller-Lionberg
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.770

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.