Literature DB >> 18365212

Decision making.

Arnold H Menezes1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The craniocervical junction is affected by numerous pathological processes. This involves congenital, developmental, and acquired abnormalities. It can result in neurological deficit secondary to neurovascular compression, abnormal cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, and craniovertebral instability. A physiological approach based on an understanding of the craniovertebral junction dynamics, the site of encroachment and stability was formulated in 1977 and has stood the test of time. The author has reviewed 5,300 patients with neurological symptoms and signs secondary to an abnormality of the craniocervical junction. This includes 2,100 children. TREATMENT OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION ABNORMALITIES: The factors that influence the specific treatment are: (1) reducibility of the lesion, (2) mechanics of compression and the direction of encroachment, (3) the presence of abnormal ossification centers and epiphyseal growth plates, and (4) the cause of the pathological process. STABILITY AT THE CRANIOCERVICAL JUNCTION: Instability at the craniocervical junction is considered when the predental space is more than 5 mm in children below the age of 8, when the separation of the lateral atlantal masses is more than 6 mm where the cruciate ligament is felt to be disrupted, and if there is vertical translation of more than 2 mm between the clivus and the odontoid process signifying occipital instability. The gap between the occipital condyle and the lateral atlas facet should never be visible on lateral cervical radiographs. Present day magnetic resonance imaging can visualize disrupted transverse cruciate ligament, alar ligaments, tectorial membrane, and bony malalignment. The primary aim of treatment is to relieve compression at the cervicomedullary junction. Hence, stabilization is paramount in reducible lesions to maintain neural decompression. Irreducible lesions require decompression at the site where the compression has occurred; these were divided into ventral and dorsal compression states. In the former compression state, the operative procedure was a ventral decompression through a palatopharyngeal route, LeForte dropdown maxillotomy, or the lateral extrapharyngeal approach. In dorsal or dorsolateral compression states, a posterolateral decompression is required. If instability is present after decompression, posterior fixation is mandated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18365212     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-008-0604-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  36 in total

1.  Chiari I malformation associated with ventral compression and instability: one-stage posterior decompression and fusion with a new instrumentation technique.

Authors:  Misao Nishikawa; Kenji Ohata; Motoki Baba; Yuzou Terakawa; Mitsuhiro Hara
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Anatomical suitability of C1-2 transarticular screw placement in pediatric patients.

Authors:  D L Brockmeyer; J E York; R I Apfelbaum
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Fusion and instrumentation at C1-3 via the high anterior cervical approach.

Authors:  J R Vender; S J Harrison; D E McDonnell
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Basilar invagination in osteogenesis imperfecta and related osteochondrodysplasias: medical and surgical management.

Authors:  P D Sawin; A H Menezes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Traumatic anterior atlanto-occipital dislocation.

Authors:  B Powers; M D Miller; R S Kramer; S Martinez; J A Gehweiler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  A new appraisal of abnormalities of the odontoid process associated with atlanto-axial subluxation and neurological disability.

Authors:  J M Stevens; W K Chong; C Barber; B E Kendall; H A Crockard
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Occipitoatlantal hypermobility.

Authors:  S W Wiesel; R H Rothman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Cervicomedullary compression in achondroplasia.

Authors:  T C Ryken; A H Menezes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  The use of autologous skull bone grafts for posterior fusion of the upper cervical spine in children.

Authors:  A T Casey; R D Hayward; W F Harkness; H A Crockard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Transverse atlantal ligament disruption associated with odontoid fractures.

Authors:  K A Greene; C A Dickman; F F Marciano; J Drabier; B P Drayer; V K Sonntag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Posterior surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: review article.

Authors:  Paul D Kiely; John C Quinn; Jerry Y Du; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-02-10

Review 2.  Spinal involvement in mucopolysaccharidoses: a review.

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Donato Rigante; Daniele Zaccaria Amato; Roberto Casale; Luigi Pedone; Nicola Magarelli; Cesare Colosimo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  The role of imaging in the pre- and postoperative evaluation of posterior occipito-cervical fusion.

Authors:  A Leone; A Costantini; M Visocchi; A Vestito; P Colelli; N Magarelli; C Colosimo; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Pediatric Craniovertebral Junction Surgery.

Authors:  Nobuhito Morota
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Use of intraoperative X-ray to differentiate between reducible versus irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

Authors:  Nupur Pruthi; Lokesh S Nehete
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-06-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.