Literature DB >> 18363974

Influence of population structure on estimates of direct and maternal parameters.

M Heydarpour1, L R Schaeffer, M H Yazdi.   

Abstract

The estimation of (co)variance components for multiple traits with maternal genetic effects was found to be influenced by population structure. Two traits in a closed breeding herd with random mating were simulated over nine generations. Population structures were simulated on the basis of different proportions of dams not having performance records (0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.8 and 0.9): three genetic correlations (-0.5, 0.0 and +0.5) between direct and maternal effects and three genetic correlations (0, 0.3 and 0.8) between two traits. Three ratios of direct to maternal genetic variances, (1:3, 1:1, 3:1), were also considered. Variance components were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood. The proportion of dams without records had an effect on the SE of direct-maternal covariance estimates when the proportion was 0.8 or 0.9 and the true correlation between direct and maternal effects was negative. The ratio of direct to maternal genetic variances influenced the SE of the (co)variance estimates more than the proportion of dams with missing records. The correlation between two traits did not have an effect on the SE of the estimates. The proportion of dams without records and the correlation between direct and maternal effects had the strongest effects on bias of estimates. The largest biases were obtained when the proportion of dams without records was high, the correlation between direct and maternal effects was positive, and the direct variance was greater than the maternal variance, as would be the situation for most growth traits in livestock. Total bias in all parameter estimates for two traits was large in the same situations. Poor population structure can affect both bias and SE of estimates of the direct-maternal genetic correlation, and can explain some of the large negative estimates often obtained.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18363974     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00703.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  7 in total

1.  Genetic variances and covariances of live weight traits in Charolais cattle by multi-trait analysis.

Authors:  J B Herrera-Ojeda; G M Parra-Bracamonte; N Lopez-Villalobos; J C Martínez-González; J G Magaña-Monforte; S T Morris; L A López-Bustamante
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters for individual birth weight, weaning weight, and probe weight in Yorkshire and Landrace pigs.

Authors:  Kristen Alves; Flavio S Schenkel; Luiz F Brito; Andy Robinson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Selection Indices and Multivariate Analysis Show Similar Results in the Evaluation of Growth and Carcass Traits in Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Fernando Brito Lopes; Marcelo Corrêa da Silva; Cláudio Ulhôa Magnabosco; Marcelo Goncalves Narciso; Roberto Daniel Sainz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genomic imprinting analyses identify maternal effects as a cause of phenotypic variability in type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Inga Blunk; Hauke Thomsen; Norbert Reinsch; Manfred Mayer; Asta Försti; Jan Sundquist; Kristina Sundquist; Kari Hemminki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Antagonistic maternal and direct effects of the leptin receptor gene on body weight in pigs.

Authors:  Emma Solé; Roger Ros-Freixedes; Marc Tor; Josep Reixach; Ramona N Pena; Joan Estany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of different models for estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters on body weights in Awassi sheep.

Authors:  Hatice Hızlı; Çiğdem Takma; Ertan Yazgan
Journal:  Arch Anim Breed       Date:  2022-03-17

7.  Influence of model selection and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters in honeybee populations.

Authors:  Manuel Du; Richard Bernstein; Andreas Hoppe; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.154

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.