Literature DB >> 18363774

Discriminant analysis for longitudinal data with multiple continuous responses and possibly missing data.

Guillermo Marshall1, Rolando De la Cruz-Mesía, Fernando A Quintana, Anna E Barón.   

Abstract

Multiple outcomes are often used to properly characterize an effect of interest. This article discusses model-based statistical methods for the classification of units into one of two or more groups where, for each unit, repeated measurements over time are obtained on each outcome. We relate the observed outcomes using multivariate nonlinear mixed-effects models to describe evolutions in different groups. Due to its flexibility, the random-effects approach for the joint modeling of multiple outcomes can be used to estimate population parameters for a discriminant model that classifies units into distinct predefined groups or populations. Parameter estimation is done via the expectation-maximization algorithm with a linear approximation step. We conduct a simulation study that sheds light on the effect that the linear approximation has on classification results. We present an example using data from a study in 161 pregnant women in Santiago, Chile, where the main interest is to predict normal versus abnormal pregnancy outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18363774     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  Predictive classification of correlated targets with application to detection of metastatic cancer using functional CT imaging.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Brian P Hobbs; Jianhua Hu; Chaan S Ng; Kim-Anh Do
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The effect of random-effects misspecification on classification accuracy.

Authors:  Riham El Saeiti; Marta García-Fiñana; David M Hughes
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.829

3.  Discriminant analysis for repeated measures data: a review.

Authors:  Lisa M Lix; Tolulope T Sajobi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-09-09

4.  Longitudinal discriminant analysis of hemoglobin level for predicting preeclampsia.

Authors:  Malihe Nasiri; Soghrat Faghihzadeh; Hamid Alavi Majd; Farid Zayeri; Noorosadat Kariman; Nastaran Safavi Ardebili
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  A comparison of group prediction approaches in longitudinal discriminant analysis.

Authors:  David M Hughes; Riham El Saeiti; Marta García-Fiñana
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Dynamic longitudinal discriminant analysis using multiple longitudinal markers of different types.

Authors:  David M Hughes; Arnošt Komárek; Gabriela Czanner; Marta Garcia-Fiñana
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Repeated measures discriminant analysis using multivariate generalized estimation equations.

Authors:  Anita Brobbey; Samuel Wiebe; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Colin Bruce Josephson; Tyler Williamson; Lisa M Lix; Tolulope T Sajobi
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Dynamic classification using credible intervals in longitudinal discriminant analysis.

Authors:  David M Hughes; Arnošt Komárek; Laura J Bonnett; Gabriela Czanner; Marta García-Fiñana
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.