Literature DB >> 18363423

Diagnosis of unipolar depression following initial identification of bipolar disorder: a common and costly misdiagnosis.

Michael D Stensland1, Jennifer F Schultz, Jennifer R Frytak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder is challenging to diagnose in medical practice.
OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were (1) to determine the rate of depression misdiagnosis in patients previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder in administrative claims, (2) to determine the resulting increased treatment costs, and (3) to verify the misdiagnoses in the medical charts for a subset of patients.
METHOD: We employed cohort analysis using claims from a large, commercial, U.S. health plan from January 2001 through December 2003. Inclusion criteria included 2 bipolar disorder diagnoses (ICD-9-CM criteria), continuous enrollment for 1 year before and after initial bipolar disorder diagnosis, age 18-64 years, and a pharmacy benefit. Propensity scoring was used to control for differences between patients with and without 2 depression diagnoses in the year following their bipolar disorder diagnosis. Medical charts were obtained for 100 patients, including 76 with a bipolar disorder diagnosis chart from one provider and a depression diagnosis chart from a second provider.
RESULTS: Of 3119 bipolar disorder patients meeting inclusion criteria, 857 (27.5%) had subsequent depression misdiagnoses during the follow-up year. These patients had 1.82 times more psychiatric hospitalizations and 2.47 times more psychiatric emergency room visits. For 673 patients (78.5%), a different provider gave the depression misdiagnosis. Annual per-patient treatment costs were significantly higher (p < .001) for those diagnosed with depression ($12,594) than for those not ($9405). In the chart review, both the bipolar disorder and subsequent depression diagnoses were confirmed for 65.8% (50/76) of the patients who had charts from 2 different providers.
CONCLUSIONS: More than one quarter of individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder received an ostensible depression misdiagnosis during the follow-up period. Significant (p = .001) increases in psychiatric inpatient hospitalization suggest that improvements in the continuity of care could improve outcomes and reduce costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18363423     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  14 in total

1.  Comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders associated with a lower use of mood stabilisers in patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder: a descriptive analysis of the cross-sectional data of 566 patients.

Authors:  K Gao; D E Kemp; C Conroy; S J Ganocy; R L Findling; J R Calabrese
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Within- and Between-Session Changes in Neural Activity During Emotion Processing in Unipolar and Bipolar Depression.

Authors:  Jay C Fournier; Henry W Chase; Jorge Almeida; Mary L Phillips
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-11

3.  Lack of association between MAGEL2 and schizophrenia and mood disorders in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Yasuhisa Fukuo; Taro Kishi; Tomo Okochi; Tsuyoshi Kitajima; Tomoko Tsunoka; Takenori Okumukura; Yoko Kinoshita; Kunihiro Kawashima; Yoshio Yamanouchi; Wakako Umene-Nakano; Hiroshi Naitoh; Toshiya Inada; Reiji Yoshimura; Jun Nakamura; Norio Ozaki; Nakao Iwata
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 4.  Cost-of-illness studies for bipolar disorder: systematic review of international studies.

Authors:  Huajie Jin; Paul McCrone
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Depression diagnoses following the identification of bipolar disorder: costly incongruent diagnoses.

Authors:  Michael D Stensland; Jennifer F Schultz; Jennifer R Frytak
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  HTR2A is associated with SSRI response in major depressive disorder in a Japanese cohort.

Authors:  Taro Kishi; Reiji Yoshimura; Tsuyoshi Kitajima; Tomo Okochi; Takenori Okumura; Tomoko Tsunoka; Yoshio Yamanouchi; Yoko Kinoshita; Kunihiro Kawashima; Hiroshi Naitoh; Jun Nakamura; Norio Ozaki; Nakao Iwata
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.843

7.  Translin-associated factor X gene (TSNAX) may be associated with female major depressive disorder in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Akiko Okuda; Taro Kishi; Tomo Okochi; Masashi Ikeda; Tsuyoshi Kitajima; Tomoko Tsunoka; Takenori Okumukura; Yasuhisa Fukuo; Yoko Kinoshita; Kunihiro Kawashima; Yoshio Yamanouchi; Toshiya Inada; Norio Ozaki; Nakao Iwata
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Association study of clock gene (CLOCK) and schizophrenia and mood disorders in the Japanese population.

Authors:  Taro Kishi; Tsuyoshi Kitajima; Masashi Ikeda; Yoshio Yamanouchi; Yoko Kinoshita; Kunihiro Kawashima; Tomo Okochi; Takenori Okumura; Tomoko Tsunoka; Toshiya Inada; Norio Ozaki; Nakao Iwata
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Differences in symptom expression between unipolar and bipolar spectrum depression: Results from a nationally representative sample using item response theory (IRT).

Authors:  Nicolas Hoertel; Carlos Blanco; Hugo Peyre; Melanie M Wall; Kibby McMahon; Philip Gorwood; Cédric Lemogne; Frédéric Limosin
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Can depression be diagnosed by response to mother's face? A personalized attachment-based paradigm for diagnostic fMRI.

Authors:  Xian Zhang; Zimri S Yaseen; Igor I Galynker; Joy Hirsch; Arnold Winston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.