Literature DB >> 18362825

Does elective caesarean section increase utilization of postpartum maternal medical care?

Tsai-Ching Liu1, Chin-Shyan Chen, Herng-Ching Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been no studies that quantitatively assess postpartum maternal medical care utilization for elective caesarean section (CS) versus vaginal delivery procedures.
METHODS: This study used population-based data linked with birth file data to explore the association between delivery modes (elective CS vs. vaginal delivery) and the utilization of postpartum maternal medical care (outpatient visits and inpatient care) during the 6-month postdelivery period. The analysis was restricted to term deliveries to avoid biased estimation.
RESULTS: The average number of postpartum outpatient visits for elective CS (3.14) was slightly higher than the average number of visits for vaginal deliveries (2.87). Similarly, the total amount of postpartum maternal medical expenditures involved was slightly higher for elective CS than for vaginal deliveries [NT$2811 (US$73.6) vs. NT$2570 (US$71.4)]. The likelihood of postpartum outpatient visits taking place within the 6-month postdelivery period was also slightly higher for elective CS than for vaginal deliveries (77% vs. 70%). The regression results showed that elective CS was associated with significantly higher utilization of maternal medical care compared with vaginal deliveries.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference between elective CS and vaginal deliveries in terms of postpartum medical care utilization is statistically significant, the small magnitude of the difference in cost (NT$72; US$2.2) suggests that it may not be clinically significant, and may only be marginally important from a policy perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18362825     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31816493e9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Decision-making process for choosing an elective cesarean delivery among primiparas in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shiou-Yun Huang; Shuh-Jen Sheu; Chen-Jei Tai; Ching-Ping Chiang; Li-Yin Chien
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

3.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Likelihood of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald E Iverson; Lois McCloskey
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Determinants of cesarean delivery in the US: a lifecourse approach.

Authors:  Whitney P Witt; Lauren E Wisk; Erika R Cheng; Kara Mandell; Debanjana Chatterjee; Fathima Wakeel; Amy L Godecker; Dakota Zarak
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-01

5.  Mind the information gap: fertility rate and use of cesarean delivery and tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2011-12-12

6.  Mode of Delivery Is Associated with Postpartum Depression: Do Women with and without Depression History Exhibit a Difference?

Authors:  Tsai-Ching Liu; Hui-Chun Peng; Conmin Chen; Chin-Shyan Chen
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14

7.  A Study of Frailty, Mortality, and Health Depreciation Factors in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jwu-Rong Lin; Erin Hui-Chuan Kao; Shuo-Chun Weng; Ellen Rouyer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.