Literature DB >> 18362722

Transverse effects after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion in the midpalatal suture using computed tomography.

Patricia P Loddi1, Max D Pereira, Angela B Wolosker, Claudia T Hino, Tessie M Kreniski, Lydia M Ferreira.   

Abstract

Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion is the treatment of choice for correcting maxillary transverse deficiency in adults. Traditionally, the appliance for expansion is tooth-borne and tissue-tooth-borne devices (Hyrax and Haas). Although a number clinical and radiographic studies have evaluated the surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion, only limited information is available to study the transverse movement of the midpalatal suture with computed tomography. Forty adult patients of both sexes, ranging in age from 18 to 38 years, with bilateral transverse maxillary deficiency were operated on. Twenty patients had Hyrax expander, and 20 had Haas expander. Under general anesthesia, subtotal Le Fort I osteotomy was performed including pterygomaxillary dysjunction. The width of the midpalatal suture opening was measured at the anterior edge of the midpalatal suture and at the junction of the midpalatal suture and palatal bones, using computed tomography in axial acquisition, obtained in the preoperative period and immediately after the end of expansion. A digital caliper was used to measure Haas and Hyrax distance on the central jackscrew preoperatively and postoperatively. The proportion between the midpalatal suture expansion and the amount of expansion on the jackscrew was evaluated. The mean of midpalatal suture opening and screw opening for Haas group was 5.19 and 8.78 mm, and for the Hyrax group, 5.85 and 8.51 mm, respectively. Both groups showed parallel-shaped separation of the midpalatal opening with no significant difference in the anterior and posterior portion. Midpalatal/jackscrews opening proportion was greater in the Hyrax group (69,2%) than in the Haas group (60%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18362722     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318163e2f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Expansion patterns in surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion : Transpalatal distractor versus hyrax appliance.

Authors:  Felix Kunz; Christian Linz; Gregor Baunach; Hartmut Böhm; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Short-term and long-term stability of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion revisited.

Authors:  Sylvain Chamberland; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Ultrasonography in the evaluation of the mid-palatal suture in rapid palatal expansion.

Authors:  I Gumussoy; O Miloglu; I S Bayrakdar; S Dagistan; F Caglayan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Evaluation of opening pattern and bone neoformation at median palatal suture area in patients submitted to surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) through cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel Gomes Salgueiro; Vitor Hugo Leite de Oliveira Rodrigues; Victor Tieghi Neto; Carolina Carmo de Menezes; Eduardo Sanches Gonçales; Osny Ferreira Júnior
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Effects of strontium ranelate on bone formation in the mid-palatal suture after rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Shuya Zhao; Xuxia Wang; Na Li; Yun Chen; Yuran Su; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  The effects of maxillary expansion on the soft tissue facial profile.

Authors:  Isil Aras; Sultan Olmez; Mehmet Cemal Akay; Tayfun Gunbay; Aynur Aras
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-10-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.