Literature DB >> 18361707

A systematic review of technical evaluation in telemedicine systems.

Malcolm Clarke1, Chinnaya A Thiyagarajan.   

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to critically analyse the technical evaluation and assessment frameworks that have been applied to telemedicine systems. A total of 47 articles met the inclusion criteria. Subjective methods were predominantly used for technical evaluation (59%), e.g., Likert scale. Those including objective measurements (41%) were mainly restricted to simple metrics such as network time delays. Only 3 papers included a rigorous standards-based objective approach. Our investigation has been unable to determine a definitive standards-based telemedicine evaluation framework that exists in the literature that may be applied systematically to assess and compare telemedicine systems. We conclude that work needs to be done to address this deficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18361707     DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Telemed J E Health        ISSN: 1530-5627            Impact factor:   3.536


  2 in total

1.  [Evaluation of an internet-based e-learning ophthalmology module for medical students].

Authors:  A Stahl; M Boeker; C Ehlken; H Agostini; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  How does it work? Factors involved in telemedicine home-interventions effectiveness: A review of reviews.

Authors:  Chiara Bertoncello; Massimiliano Colucci; Tatjana Baldovin; Alessandra Buja; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.