Literature DB >> 18360733

Social capital elite, excluded participators, busy working parents and aging, participating less: types of community participators and their mental health.

Helen Louise Berry1.   

Abstract

With the prevalence and costs of mental health problems increasing, safe, effective and economically viable prevention and treatment strategies are urgently needed. Community participation is protectively linked to mental health and is considered a valid mental health promotion strategy. However, little consideration has been given to socio-demographically driven patterns of participation that would differentially affect the success of such a strategy. The aims of this study were to group and describe members of a socio-economically disadvantaged rural region according to patterns of community participation, report on their levels of social cohesion and psychological distress and reflect on policy implications. Participants were 963 community members, aged 19-97, randomly selected from a socio-economically disadvantaged coastal Australian region, who voluntarily completed an anonymous postal survey. Measures included (1) frequency of fourteen types of participation, (2) thoughts and feelings about each type, and (3) five aspects of social cohesion. Two-step cluster analysis was undertaken to derive groupings of respondents based on their socio-demographic characteristics and levels of and perceptions about their participation. Psychological distress was assessed for each group. Four distinct groupings of participants were identified: social capital elite; busy working parents; aging, participating less; and excluded participators. The last of these reported particularly poor participation, cohesion and psychological distress. For mental health promotion strategies to be effective, they must be tailored to the circumstances of intended recipients. This requires a sophisticated analysis of target groups. This study has shown that members of a socio-economically disadvantaged rural region may be described according to systematically varying patterns of socio-demographic characteristics, participation, social cohesion and distress. Policy-makers might consider (1) how and whether different groups might respond to the use of increased community participation as a mental health promotion strategy and (2) barriers that might have to be overcome in different groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18360733     DOI: 10.1007/s00127-008-0331-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  29 in total

1.  Youth mental health promotion in the Hunter region.

Authors:  T Waring; T Hazell; P Hazell; J Adams
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.744

Review 2.  Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Charles Royer; Reid Ewing; Timothy D McBride
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Social capital and mental health: a comparative analysis of four low income countries.

Authors:  Mary J De Silva; Sharon R Huttly; Trudy Harpham; Michael G Kenward
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Does reported health promotion activity neglect people with ill-health?

Authors:  S A Buetow; N M Kerse
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Prognostic factors in major depression: a long-term follow-up study of 323 patients.

Authors:  T Riise; A Lund
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  Epidemiology of participation: an Australian community study.

Authors:  F E Baum; R A Bush; C C Modra; C J Murray; E M Cox; K M Alexander; R C Potter
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Into work, through tailored paths: a two-year follow-up of the return-to-work rehabilitation and re-employment project.

Authors:  Pirjo Juvonen-Posti; Tapani Kallanranta; Sirkka-Liisa Eksyma; Keijo Piirainen; Sirkka Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  The decline in bulk-billing and increase in out-of-pocket costs for general practice consultations in rural areas of Australia, 1995-2001.

Authors:  Anne F Young; Annette J Dobson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Utilisation of general practitioner services by socio-economic disadvantage and geographic remoteness.

Authors:  Gavin Turrell; Brian F Oldenburg; Elizabeth Harris; Damien Jolley
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.939

10.  Health promotion for socially disadvantaged groups: the case of homeless older men in Australia.

Authors:  Susan Quine; Hal Kendig; Cherry Russell; Denise Touchard
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.483

View more
  7 in total

1.  Social networks and mental health among a farming population.

Authors:  Helen J Stain; Brian Kelly; Terry J Lewin; Nick Higginbotham; John R Beard; Fleur Hourihan
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 2.  Social capital, health, and elderly driver status.

Authors:  Stephen T Isbel; Helen L Berry
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2016-03-24

3.  Ageing well: evaluation of social participation and quality of life tools to enhance community aged care (study protocol).

Authors:  Lindsey Brett; Andrew Georgiou; Mikaela Jorgensen; Joyce Siette; Grace Scott; Edwina Gow; Gemma Luckett; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Social capital and mental health among mothers in Vietnam who have children with disabilities.

Authors:  Nguyen Thi Minh Thuy; Helen L Berry
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  The relationship between employment and social participation among Australians with a disabling chronic health condition: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Emily Callander; Deborah J Schofield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Social Capital as a Determinant of Self-Rated Health in Women of Reproductive Age: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Azam Baheiraei; Fatemeh Bakouei; Sareh Bakouei; Narges Eskandari; Hoda Ahmari Tehran
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-07-19

7.  Belonging and Inclusivity Make a Resilient Future for All: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Post-Flood Social Capital in a Diverse Australian Rural Community.

Authors:  Veronica Matthews; Jo Longman; James Bennett-Levy; Maddy Braddon; Megan Passey; Ross S Bailie; Helen L Berry
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.