Literature DB >> 18360290

Determination of clinically relevant cutoffs for HIV-1 phenotypic resistance estimates through a combined analysis of clinical trial and cohort data.

Bart Winters1, Julio Montaner, P Richard Harrigan, Brian Gazzard, Anton Pozniak, Michael D Miller, Sean Emery, Frank van Leth, Patrick Robinson, John D Baxter, Marie Perez-Elias, Delivette Castor, Scott Hammer, Alex Rinehart, Hans Vermeiren, Elke Van Craenenbroeck, Lee Bacheler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant cutoffs are needed for the interpretation of HIV-1 phenotypic resistance estimates as predicted by "virtual" phenotype HIV resistance analysis.
METHODS: Using a clinical data set containing 2596 treatment change episodes in 2217 patients in 8 clinical trials and 2 population-based cohorts, drug-specific linear regression models were developed to describe the relation between baseline characteristics (resistance, viral load, and treatment history), new treatment regimen selected, and 8-week virologic outcome.
RESULTS: These models were used to derive clinical cutoffs (CCOs) for 6 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (zidovudine, lamivudine, stavudine, didanosine, abacavir, and tenofovir), 3 unboosted protease inhibitors (PIs; indinavir, amprenavir, and nelfinavir), and 4 ritonavir-boosted PIs (indinavir/ritonavir, amprenavir/ritonavir, saquinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir). The CCOs were defined as the phenotypic resistance levels (fold change [FC]) associated with a 20% and 80% loss of predicted wild-type drug effect and depended on the drug-specific dynamic range of the assay.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed CCOs were better correlated with virologic response than were biological cutoffs and provide a relevant tool for estimating the resistance to antiretroviral drug combinations used in clinical practice. They can be applied to diverse patient populations and are based on a consistent methodologic approach to interpreting phenotypic drug resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18360290     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31816d9bf4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  14 in total

Review 1.  HIV-1 drug resistance mutations: an updated framework for the second decade of HAART.

Authors:  Robert W Shafer; Jonathan M Schapiro
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  HIV drug resistance detected during low-level viraemia is associated with subsequent virologic failure.

Authors:  Luke C Swenson; Jeong Eun Min; Conan K Woods; Eric Cai; Jonathan Z Li; Julio S G Montaner; P Richard Harrigan; Alejandro Gonzalez-Serna
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Novel method for simultaneous quantification of phenotypic resistance to maturation, protease, reverse transcriptase, and integrase HIV inhibitors based on 3'Gag(p2/p7/p1/p6)/PR/RT/INT-recombinant viruses: a useful tool in the multitarget era of antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Jan Weber; Ana C Vazquez; Dane Winner; Justine D Rose; Doug Wylie; Ariel M Rhea; Kenneth Henry; Jennifer Pappas; Alison Wright; Nizar Mohamed; Richard Gibson; Benigno Rodriguez; Vicente Soriano; Kevin King; Eric J Arts; Paul D Olivo; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Residual activity of two HIV antiretroviral regimens prescribed without virological monitoring.

Authors:  D T Dunn; R L Goodall; P Munderi; C Kityo; M Ranopa; L Bacheler; M Van Houtte; C Gilks; P Kaleebu; D Pillay
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Mutation T74S in HIV-1 subtype B and C proteases resensitizes them to ritonavir and indinavir and confers fitness advantage.

Authors:  Esmeralda A Soares; André F Santos; Luis M Gonzalez; Matthew S Lalonde; Denis M Tebit; Amilcar Tanuri; Eric J Arts; Marcelo A Soares
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Hypersusceptibility mechanism of Tenofovir-resistant HIV to EFdA.

Authors:  Eleftherios Michailidis; Emily M Ryan; Atsuko Hachiya; Karen A Kirby; Bruno Marchand; Maxwell D Leslie; Andrew D Huber; Yee T Ong; Jacob C Jackson; Kamalendra Singh; Eiichi N Kodama; Hiroaki Mitsuya; Michael A Parniak; Stefan G Sarafianos
Journal:  Retrovirology       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 4.602

7.  "Dynamic range" of inferred phenotypic HIV drug resistance values in clinical practice.

Authors:  Luke C Swenson; Graham Pollock; Brian Wynhoven; Theresa Mo; Winnie Dong; Robert S Hogg; Julio S G Montaner; P Richard Harrigan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  K70Q adds high-level tenofovir resistance to "Q151M complex" HIV reverse transcriptase through the enhanced discrimination mechanism.

Authors:  Atsuko Hachiya; Eiichi N Kodama; Matthew M Schuckmann; Karen A Kirby; Eleftherios Michailidis; Yasuko Sakagami; Shinichi Oka; Kamalendra Singh; Stefan G Sarafianos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Clinical management of HIV drug resistance.

Authors:  Karoll J Cortez; Frank Maldarelli
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Comparison of predicted susceptibility between genotype and virtual phenotype HIV drug resistance interpretation systems among treatment-naive HIV-infected patients in Asia: TASER-M cohort analysis.

Authors:  Awachana Jiamsakul; Rami Kantor; Patrick C K Li; Sunee Sirivichayakul; Thira Sirisanthana; Pacharee Kantipong; Christopher K C Lee; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Winai Ratanasuwan; Rossana Ditangco; Thida Singtoroj; Somnuek Sungkanuparph
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.