Literature DB >> 18359675

Antimicrobial coating agents: can biofilm formation on a breast implant be prevented?

Johan van Heerden1, Martin Turner, Danie Hoffmann, Johan Moolman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous clinical studies have shown that biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis on the outer surface of a silicone breast implant is strongly associated with capsular contracture formation. Traditional administration of systemic antibiotics and antiseptic washing are not necessarily the most effective methods for the prevention of initial biofilm formation on implants in the clinical scenario. In this study an alternative or supplement was sought for preventing or delaying bacterial colonisation and adherence to the outer surface of a breast implant, by establishing an in vitro model for investigating this complex problem. The in vitro antimicrobial activity of several antimicrobial agents was investigated for inhibitory effects on biofilm formation by S. epidermidis.
METHODS: The study consisted of two experiments. The first experiment consisted of two groups (A and B) of seven discs each whilst the second experiment was divided into three groups (C, D and E) of 14 discs each. Each group of 14 consisted of seven smooth and seven textured discs. Discs (biopsies) of each implant were individually coated with one of six different antimicrobial agents. Controls that received no agent were included in the various experimental groups. In the first experiment disc diffusion sensitivity testing was performed and inhibition zone sizes were measured. In the second experiment the discs were cultured in broth. The degree of biofilm formation was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
RESULTS: In the first in vitro experiment, all six agents showed a measurable antimicrobial effect against the biofilm-forming strain of S. epidermidis when compared to the effect against the American Type Culture Collection strain. In the second in vitro experiment, discs coated with Chloramex, Fucidin and Terramycin did not allow biofilm formation to take place for at least 7 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation on the outer surface of a silicone breast implant was prevented in vitro for at least 7 days by coating with an appropriate antimicrobial agent. Further evaluation of the interaction between antimicrobial coating agents and S. epidermidis biofilm formation needs to be made before conclusions regarding the clinical scenario can be drawn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18359675     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

1.  Superdurable Coating Fabricated from a Double-Sided Tape with Long Term "Zero" Bacterial Adhesion.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Yang Lu; Hui Zhu; Zhiqiang Cao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Histologic, Molecular, and Clinical Evaluation of Explanted Breast Prostheses, Capsules, and Acellular Dermal Matrices for Bacteria.

Authors:  Louis Poppler; Justin Cohen; Utku Can Dolen; Andrew E Schriefer; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Corey Deeken; Richard A Chole; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 3.  The Relationship of Bacterial Biofilms and Capsular Contracture in Breast Implants.

Authors:  Dragana Ajdic; Yasmina Zoghbi; David Gerth; Zubin J Panthaki; Seth Thaller
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.283

4.  An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence.

Authors:  D Sanders; J Lambie; P Bond; R Moate; J A Steer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Bacteriophage-Derived Peptidase CHAP(K) Eliminates and Prevents Staphylococcal Biofilms.

Authors:  Mark Fenton; Ruth Keary; Olivia McAuliffe; R Paul Ross; Jim O'Mahony; Aidan Coffey
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-03

6.  Comparative characterisation of genotypically different clones of MRSA in the production of biofilms.

Authors:  Salman Sahab Atshan; Mariana Nor Shamsudin; Leslie Than Thian Lung; Zamberi Sekawi; Ehsanollah Ghaznavi-Rad; Chong Pei Pei
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-14

7.  Silicone Implants with Smooth Surfaces Induce Thinner but Denser Fibrotic Capsules Compared to Those with Textured Surfaces in a Rodent Model.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; Christoph Hirche; Matthias A Reichenberger; Jurij Kiefer; Yannick Diehm; Srinivasan Mukundan; Muayyad Alhefzi; Ericka M Bueno; Ulrich Kneser; Bohdan Pomahac
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Advances in microbial biofilm prevention on indwelling medical devices with emphasis on usage of acoustic energy.

Authors:  Naama Dror; Mathilda Mandel; Zadik Hazan; Gad Lavie
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 9.  Capsular contracture by silicone breast implants: possible causes, biocompatibility, and prophylactic strategies.

Authors:  Andreas E Steiert; Maria Boyce; Heiko Sorg
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2013-12-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.