Literature DB >> 18359166

Application of 10% imidacloprid/50% permethrin to prevent Ehrlichia canis exposure in dogs under natural conditions.

Domenico Otranto1, Paola Paradies, Gabriella Testini, Maria Stefania Latrofa, Stefania Weigl, Cinzia Cantacessi, Norbert Mencke, Donato de Caprariis, Antonio Parisi, Gioia Capelli, Dorothee Stanneck.   

Abstract

Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME) caused by Ehrlichia canis is the most known canine tick-borne disease (TBD) spread throughout the world. Preventing tick bites is a priority to reduce the risk of TBDs and it was the aim of the present study to evaluate the efficacy of a combination of imidacloprid 10% and permethrin 50% (ImPer) (Advantix; Bayer AG, Germany) in a spot-on formulation to control CME under field conditions. On January-March 2005, 845 dogs from two kennels in southern Italy (kennels of Bari (KB)- and Ginosa (KG)), with a history of tick infestation were initially tested by serology and PCR assay for E. canis infection. Data on Leishmania infantum infection were also available from a previous study carried out on the same dog population. One hundred twenty-six dogs (14.9%) presented anti-E. canis antibodies with a relative prevalence of 15.6% (n=65 dogs in KB) and 14.2% (n=61 dogs in KG). Five hundred thirty-five animals found negative both for E. canis and L. infantum infections were enrolled in three groups (Group A--treated with ImPer once a month; Group B--treated every 2 weeks; and Group C--untreated control animals) and monitored for E. canis infection by serology and PCR in November 2005 (first follow-up) and in March 2006 (second follow-up). The E. canis infection was serologically revealed, at the first and/or second follow-up, in 26 animals from Group C in KB and KG (mean incidence density rate (IDR), 13.24%) while in none of the animals from Group A (KB and KG) and only in one animal from Group B (IDR 1.13%) in KG. The final protection efficacy of ImPer ranged from 95.57% to 100% in Groups B and A. At PCR only 15 dogs from KG were positive for Rickettsiales only at the first follow-up and at the sequence analysis two (both in Group C) revealed 100% homology with E. canis sequences while 13 with Anaplasma platys. Four out of 13 A. platys PCR-positive dogs were also seropositive for E. canis at one or both follow-ups. ImPer, by virtue of its repellent and acaricidal activity against ticks, has been shown to be efficacious to prevent E. canis infection in treated dogs living under natural conditions in endemic areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18359166     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  12 in total

1.  Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and D. immitis in hunting dogs from southern Italy.

Authors:  Diego Piantedosi; Benedetto Neola; Nicola D'Alessio; Francesca Di Prisco; Mario Santoro; Laura Pacifico; Giovanni Sgroi; Luigi Auletta; Jesse Buch; Ramaswamy Chandrashekar; Edward B Breitschwerdt; Vincenzo Veneziano
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Canine and feline vector-borne diseases in Italy: current situation and perspectives.

Authors:  Domenico Otranto; Filipe Dantas-Torres
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Diagnosis of canine vector-borne diseases in young dogs: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Domenico Otranto; Gabriella Testini; Filipe Dantas-Torres; Maria S Latrofa; Pedro Paulo Vissotto de Paiva Diniz; Donato de Caprariis; Riccardo P Lia; Norbert Mencke; Dorothee Stanneck; Gioia Capelli; Edward B Breitschwerdt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Preventive efficacy of Frontline® Combo and Certifect® against Dipylidium caninum infestation of cats and dogs using a natural flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestation model.

Authors:  Frederic Beugnet; Peet Delport; Hermann Luus; Dione Crafford; Josephus Fourie
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  The speed of kill of fluralaner (Bravecto™) against Ixodes ricinus ticks on dogs.

Authors:  Christina Wengenmayer; Heike Williams; Eva Zschiesche; Andreas Moritz; Judith Langenstein; Rainer K A Roepke; Anja R Heckeroth
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Seropositivity rates for agents of canine vector-borne diseases in Spain: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Guadalupe Miró; Ana Montoya; Xavier Roura; Rosa Gálvez; Angel Sainz
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Effect of owner-controlled acaricidal treatment on tick infestation and immune response to tick-borne pathogens in naturally infested dogs from Eastern Austria.

Authors:  Michael Leschnik; Andrea Feiler; Georg G Duscher; Anja Joachim
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  The efficacy of Advantix® to prevent transmission of Ehrlichia canis to dogs by Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks.

Authors:  Josephus Johannes Fourie; Herman Gerhardus Luus; Dorothee Stanneck; Frans Jongejan
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Efficacy of an imidacloprid/flumethrin collar against fleas, ticks and tick-borne pathogens in dogs.

Authors:  Filipe Dantas-Torres; Gioia Capelli; Alessio Giannelli; Rafael Antonio Nascimento Ramos; Riccardo Paolo Lia; Cinzia Cantacessi; Donato de Caprariis; Anna Sara De Tommasi; Maria Stefania Latrofa; Vita Lacasella; Viviana Domenica Tarallo; Giancarlo Di Paola; Barbara Qurollo; Edward Breitschwerdt; Dorothee Stanneck; Domenico Otranto
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Arthropod-borne infections in travelled dogs in Europe.

Authors:  Dietmar Hamel; Cornelia Silaghi; Kurt Pfister
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.