| Literature DB >> 18358786 |
A Haag1, S Knake, H M Hamer, F Boesebeck, H Freitag, R Schulz, P Baum, C Helmstaedter, J Wellmer, H Urbach, P Hopp, T Mayer, A Hufnagel, H Jokeit, H Lerche, I Uttner, H-J Meencke, H Meierkord, E Pauli, U Runge, J Saar, E Trinka, T Benke, S Vulliemoz, G Wiegand, U Stephani, H G Wieser, D Rating, K Werhahn, S Noachtar, A Schulze-Bonhage, K Wagner, W C J Alpherts, W van Emde Boas, F Rosenow.
Abstract
Twenty-six Austrian, Dutch, German, and Swiss epilepsy centers were asked to report on use of the Wada test (intracarotid amobarbital procedure, IAP) from 2000 to 2005 and to give their opinion regarding its role in the presurgical diagnosis of epilepsy. Sixteen of the 23 centers providing information had performed 1421 Wada tests, predominantly the classic bilateral procedure (73%). A slight nonsignificant decrease over time in Wada test frequency, despite slightly increasing numbers of resective procedures, could be observed. Complication rates were relatively low (1.09%; 0.36% with permanent deficit). Test protocols were similar even though no universal standard protocol exists. Clinicians rated the Wada test as having good reliability and validity for language determination, whereas they questioned its reliability and validity for memory lateralization. Several noninvasive functional imaging techniques are already in use. However, clinicians currently do not want to rely solely on noninvasive functional imaging in all patients.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2008 PMID： 18358786 DOI： 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.02.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsy Behav ISSN： 1525-5050 Impact factor: 2.937