Literature DB >> 18358370

Survivorship analysis at 15 years of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty.

Fahad G Attar1, Fu-Meng Khaw, Lorna M G Kirk, P J Gregg.   

Abstract

We performed a survival analysis on 354 cemented primary press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasties in 277 patients with prospective follow-up (mean, 8.8 years; range, 0.3-16.9 years). The number of patients alive reaching 15 years at follow-up for survival analysis was 15. The cumulative survival rate at 15 years was 81.7% (95% confidence interval, 72.1%-88.5%), using revision for all causes as our end point. Indications for revision in our patient group were aseptic loosening 4.5%, infection 2.3%, and exchange of polyethylene insert 1.1%. Our results indicate that the cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty has a good long-term survival, at 15 years, based on revision as the end point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18358370     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  Long-term survival analysis of posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lin Guo; Liu Yang; Jean Louis Briard; Xiao-jun Duan; Fu-you Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Posterior-stabilized versus posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Frank R Kolisek; Michael S McGrath; David R Marker; Nenette Jessup; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; C Lowry Barnes
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

3.  What are the important manoeuvres for beginners to minimize surgical time in primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kengo Harato; Shinichi Maeno; Hidenori Tanikawa; Kazuya Kaneda; Yutaro Morishige; So Nomoto; Yasuo Niki
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Joshua J Jacobs; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  The biological response to orthopaedic implants for joint replacement: Part I: Metals.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Derek F Amanatullah; Florence Loi; Jukka Pajarinen; Akira Nabeshima; Zhenyu Yao; Moussa Hamadouche; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.368

6.  Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays?

Authors:  Josa A Hanzlik; Judd S Day; Clare M Rimnac; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  Kyu-Jin Cho; Jong-Keun Seon; Won-Young Jang; Chun-Gon Park; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Cruciate Retaining compared with Posterior Stabilised Nexgen total knee arthroplasty: results at 10 years in a matched cohort.

Authors:  Aiw Mayne; H P Harshavardhan; L R Johnston; W Wang; A Jariwala
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Long-term results of Alpina Postero-stabilized total knee replacement: 10- to 16-year follow-up.

Authors:  François Lecuire; Julien Henry; Benjamin Francois; Jérôme Rubini; Maurice Basso
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-06

10.  Impact of change of knee prosthesis on early clinical outcomes in a large volume arthroplasty centre.

Authors:  P Moonot; O D'Mello; N Tzinga; K Sisak; N J Fiddian; A H Harvey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.