Literature DB >> 18357540

A comparison of posture and muscle activity during tablet computer, desktop computer and paper use by young children.

L M Straker1, J Coleman, R Skoss, B A Maslen, R Burgess-Limerick, C M Pollock.   

Abstract

Computers are now widely used by children. Tablet computers are becoming widely available and promoted for use by school children. The primary objective of this study was to compare the posture and muscle activity of children using a tablet computer to the posture and muscle activity of children using a desktop computer and paper technology. Eighteen children (mean age 5.6 years) performed a colouring-in task in tablet, desktop and paper conditions. 3-D posture and muscle activity around the neck and shoulder was assessed. Tablet computer use was similar to paper use, with less neutral spinal posture, more elevated scapular posture and greater upper trapezius and cervical erector spinae activity. This was offset by greater variability of posture and muscle activity. Tablet computer use clearly results in different musculoskeletal stresses than desktop computer use. Computer use guidelines need to be appropriate to traditional and emerging technologies. Tablet computers are being promoted for use by adults and children. However, the physical impact of using this type of technology is not known. The findings of this study provide the first tablet-specific evidence to inform guidelines on wise use of tablet computers by children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18357540     DOI: 10.1080/00140130701711000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  24 in total

1.  Effects of body postures on the shear modulus of thoracolumbar fascia: a shear wave elastography study.

Authors:  Baizhen Chen; Chunlong Liu; Ming Lin; Weixin Deng; Zhijie Zhang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A morphological adaptation? The prevalence of enlarged external occipital protuberance in young adults.

Authors:  David Shahar; Mark G L Sayers
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Bias and imprecision in posture percentile variables estimated from short exposure samples.

Authors:  Svend Erik Mathiassen; Jens Wahlström; Mikael Forsman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Screen-based activities and physical complaints among adolescents from the Nordic countries.

Authors:  Torbjørn Torsheim; Lilly Eriksson; Christina W Schnohr; Fredrik Hansen; Thoroddur Bjarnason; Raili Välimaa
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  The effects on dynamic balance of dual-tasking using smartphone functions.

Authors:  In Hyouk Hyong
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-02-17

6.  Effect of the cervical flexion angle during smart phone use on muscle fatigue of the cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius.

Authors:  Sangyong Lee; Daehee Lee; Jungseo Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  The comparison of cervical repositioning errors according to smartphone addiction grades.

Authors:  Jeonhyeong Lee; Kyochul Seo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-04-23

8.  The relationship between smartphone use and subjective musculoskeletal symptoms and university students.

Authors:  Hyo-Jeong Kim; Jin-Seop Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-03-31

9.  Cluster-based exposure variation analysis.

Authors:  Afshin Samani; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Pascal Madeleine
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  The presence of altered craniocervical posture and mobility in smartphone-addicted teenagers with temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  In-Kyung Kee; Jin-Seok Byun; Jae-Kwang Jung; Jae-Kap Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-02-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.