Lu Qi1, Cuilin Zhang, Andrew Greenberg, Frank B Hu. 1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, and Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. nhlqi@channing.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The variations in perilipin gene (PLIN) were previously associated with obesity and insulin sensitivity. We examined whether PLIN variability was associated with diabetes risk and obesity status modified such associations. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We conducted a nested case-control study of 431 incident cases of type 2 diabetes and 791 healthy control women from the Nurses' Health Study. Obesity was defined by BMI or waist circumference (central obesity). RESULTS: In the sample of all participants, PLIN variations were not significantly associated with the incidence of diabetes. The central obesity status (by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition of waist circumference>35 inches) significantly interacted with PLIN polymorphisms in relation to diabetes risk (P for interaction=0.027, 0.009, and 0.02 for rs2289487, rs8179043, and rs894160, respectively). In nonobese (central) women, carriers of rs2289487, rs8179043, and rs894160 had significantly greater risk of type 2 diabetes, adjusting for diabetes risk factors (odds ratio (OR)=1.52, 1.03-2.25; 1.54, 1.07-2.23; and 1.57, 1.09-2.27, respectively). Haplotypes possessing the three polymorphisms were also significantly associated with diabetes risk (global test, P=0.01). As compared with the most common haplotype 111, haplotype 222 and 211 (1 codes the common and 2 codes the minor alleles) were associated with 44% (OR=1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.91; P=0.01) and 70% (OR=1.70, 95% CI 1.04-2.77; P=0.03) greater risk, respectively. The PLIN variations were not significantly associated with the disease risk among women with central obesity. DISCUSSION: Our data indicate that central obesity may modify the associations between PLIN variations and diabetes risk in women.
OBJECTIVE: The variations in perilipin gene (PLIN) were previously associated with obesity and insulin sensitivity. We examined whether PLIN variability was associated with diabetes risk and obesity status modified such associations. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We conducted a nested case-control study of 431 incident cases of type 2 diabetes and 791 healthy control women from the Nurses' Health Study. Obesity was defined by BMI or waist circumference (central obesity). RESULTS: In the sample of all participants, PLIN variations were not significantly associated with the incidence of diabetes. The central obesity status (by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition of waist circumference>35 inches) significantly interacted with PLIN polymorphisms in relation to diabetes risk (P for interaction=0.027, 0.009, and 0.02 for rs2289487, rs8179043, and rs894160, respectively). In nonobese (central) women, carriers of rs2289487, rs8179043, and rs894160 had significantly greater risk of type 2 diabetes, adjusting for diabetes risk factors (odds ratio (OR)=1.52, 1.03-2.25; 1.54, 1.07-2.23; and 1.57, 1.09-2.27, respectively). Haplotypes possessing the three polymorphisms were also significantly associated with diabetes risk (global test, P=0.01). As compared with the most common haplotype 111, haplotype 222 and 211 (1 codes the common and 2 codes the minor alleles) were associated with 44% (OR=1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.91; P=0.01) and 70% (OR=1.70, 95% CI 1.04-2.77; P=0.03) greater risk, respectively. The PLIN variations were not significantly associated with the disease risk among women with central obesity. DISCUSSION: Our data indicate that central obesity may modify the associations between PLIN variations and diabetes risk in women.
Authors: J T Tansey; C Sztalryd; J Gruia-Gray; D L Roush; J V Zee; O Gavrilova; M L Reitman; C X Deng; C Li; A R Kimmel; C Londos Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-05-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: D Altshuler; J N Hirschhorn; M Klannemark; C M Lindgren; M C Vohl; J Nemesh; C R Lane; S F Schaffner; S Bolk; C Brewer; T Tuomi; D Gaudet; T J Hudson; M Daly; L Groop; E S Lander Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Yanxin Wang; Sean Sullivan; Maria Trujillo; Mi-Jeong Lee; Stephen H Schneider; Robert E Brolin; You Hou Kang; Yaron Werber; Andrew S Greenberg; Susan K Fried Journal: Obes Res Date: 2003-08
Authors: Asli Memisoglu; Frank B Hu; Susan E Hankinson; JoAnn E Manson; Immaculata De Vivo; Walter C Willett; David J Hunter Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2003-09-23 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Frank B Hu; Alessandro Doria; Tricia Li; James B Meigs; Simin Liu; Asli Memisoglu; David Hunter; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Diabetes Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: S Mottagui-Tabar; M Rydén; P Löfgren; G Faulds; J Hoffstedt; A J Brookes; I Andersson; P Arner Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2003-06-11 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Andrew S Greenberg; Rosalind A Coleman; Fredric B Kraemer; James L McManaman; Martin S Obin; Vishwajeet Puri; Qing-Wu Yan; Hideaki Miyoshi; Douglas G Mashek Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: C E Smith; D K Arnett; D Corella; M Y Tsai; C Q Lai; L D Parnell; Y C Lee; J M Ordovás Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2010-12-30 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Sophie Deram; Christiane Y Nicolau; Pablo Perez-Martinez; Isabel Guazzelli; Alfredo Halpern; Bernardo L Wajchenberg; Jose M Ordovas; Sandra M Villares Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-09-23 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Toshihide Kawai; Maggie C Y Ng; M Geoffrey Hayes; Issei Yoshiuchi; Takafumi Tsuchiya; Heather Robertson; Nancy J Cox; Kenneth S Polonsky; Graeme I Bell; David A Ehrmann Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Sherin Bakhashab; Tahani Alsulami; Amani M T Gusti; Steve Harakeh; Rajaa Al-Raddadi; Wissam A Alwazani; Huda F Alshaibi Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.141
Authors: Katarzyna Iłowiecka; Paweł Glibowski; Justyna Libera; Wojciech Koch Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-19 Impact factor: 4.614