Effect of nephrology referral on the initiation of haemodyalisis and mortality in ESRD patients.

Late nephrology referral of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been suggested as increasing mortality after the initiation of dialysis. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nephrology referral on the initiation of haemodyalisis (HD) and mortality during HD treatment in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who have died in our institution over a five-year period. We studied data from all 117 patients on HD treatment in our institution who died (after 90 days of HD treatment) in the period between 01.01. 2002 and 31.12. 2006. Early (ER) and late referral (LR) were defined by the time of follow-up by a nephrologist greater than or less than 6 months, respectively, before the initiation of haemodialysis. Out of a total of 117 patients, 37.6% (44 patients) started HD in the ER group and 62.4% (73 patients) in the LR group. At the start of HD, LR patients were older, had a higher proportion of temporary catheters and had a significantly lower levels of haemoglobin and diuresis. Creatinine clearance was less in the LR (7.67 +/- 3.86 ml/min/1.73 m2) vs. the ER group (8.70 +/- 3.62 ml/min/1.73 m2), but not significantly different. Cardiovascular disease (CVD), defined by a history of myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular disease, peripheral arteriopathy, and/or heart failure, was also significantly more common among LR patients compared to ER (56%; 27%, p = 0.002). During the haemodyalisis treatment, the LR group had significantly lower levels of haemoglobin and haematocrit. CVD accounted for about 64% of deaths observed in the LR group. According to echocardiography data, there were no significant differences in the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) between the LR and ER groups at the time of dialysis initiation, but during haemodialysis treatment the LR group had significantly greater LVMI than the ER group (232,96 +/- 92,48 g/m2 vs.184,09 +/- 51,74 g/m2; p = 0,031). The time until death in months during dialysis treatment was significantly different between the LR and ER group, (69.51 +/- 64.03 vs.113.27 +/- 89.03, p = 0.0025). LR patients experienced a greater degree of anaemia and a high prevalence of CVD at the time of dialysis initiation. Our data suggest that the anaemia, CV damage and progression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in the LR patients during haemodialysis treatment are associated with poor survival on haemodialysis.