Literature DB >> 18356570

The effect of name-based reporting and partner notification on HIV testing in New York State.

James M Tesoriero1, Haven B Battles, Karyn Heavner, Shu-Yin John Leung, Chris Nemeth, Wendy Pulver, Guthrie S Birkhead.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of New York's HIV Reporting and Partner Notification law on HIV testing levels and on the HIV testing decisions of high-risk individuals.
METHODS: In-person interviews were administered to 761 high-risk individuals to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding HIV testing and reporting. Trends in HIV testing were also assessed in publicly funded HIV counseling and testing programs, Medicaid, and New York's Maternal Pediatric Newborn Prevention and Care Program.
RESULTS: High-risk individuals had limited awareness of the reporting and notification law, and few cited concern about named reporting as a reason for avoiding or delaying HIV testing. HIV testing levels, posttest counseling rates, and anonymous-to-confidential conversion rates among those who tested HIV positive were not affected by the law. Medicaid-related HIV testing rates also remained stable. HIV testing during pregnancy continued to trend upward following implementation of the law. Findings held true within demographic and risk-related subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: HIV reporting has permitted improved monitoring of New York's HIV/AIDS epidemic. This benefit has not been offset by decreases in HIV testing behavior, including willingness to test among those at high risk of acquiring HIV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18356570      PMCID: PMC2377003          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.092742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  23 in total

1.  Changes in HIV testing after implementation of name-based HIV case surveillance in New Mexico.

Authors:  Amy Lansky; J Stan Lehman; Jill Gatwood; Frederick M Hecht; Patricia L Fleming
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Consent for prenatal testing: a preliminary examination of the effects of named HIV reporting and mandatory partner notification.

Authors:  Gail L Dolbear; Linda T Newell
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2002-05

3.  HIV test-seeking before and after the restriction of anonymous testing in North Carolina.

Authors:  I Hertz-Picciotto; L W Lee; C Hoyo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Mandatory reporting of human immunodeficiency virus testing would deter blacks and Hispanics from being tested.

Authors:  E J Fordyce; S Sambula; R Stoneburner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-21       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Mandatory reporting of HIV testing would deter men from being tested.

Authors:  S M Kegeles; T J Coates; B Lo; J A Catania
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Factors affecting gay and bisexual men's decisions and intentions to seek HIV testing.

Authors:  T Myers; K W Orr; D Locker; E A Jackson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Many people who seek anonymous HIV-antibody testing would avoid it under other circumstances.

Authors:  S M Kegeles; J A Catania; T J Coates; L M Pollack; B Lo
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.177

8.  Mandatory reporting of HIV infection and opt-out prenatal screening for HIV infection: effect on testing rates.

Authors:  Gayatri C Jayaraman; Jutta K Preiksaitis; Bryce Larke
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Anonymous HIV testing: the impact of availability on demand in Arizona.

Authors:  D Hirano; G A Gellert; K Fleming; D Boyd; S J Englender; H Hawks
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Trial of anonymous versus confidential human immunodeficiency virus testing.

Authors:  L J Fehrs; D Fleming; L R Foster; R O McAlister; V Fox; S Modesitt; R Conrad
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

1.  Making the case for laws that improve health: a framework for public health law research.

Authors:  Scott Burris; Alexander C Wagenaar; Jeffrey Swanson; Jennifer K Ibrahim; Jennifer Wood; Michelle M Mello
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Comment on name-based reporting.

Authors:  Joseph A Catania; Dennis Osmond
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Criminalization of HIV Exposure: A Review of Empirical Studies in the United States.

Authors:  Dini Harsono; Carol L Galletly; Elaine O'Keefe; Zita Lazzarini
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2017-01

4.  Community and Provider Perspectives on Molecular HIV Surveillance and Cluster Detection and Response for HIV Prevention: Qualitative Findings From King County, Washington.

Authors:  Alic G Shook; Susan E Buskin; Matthew Golden; Julia C Dombrowski; Joshua Herbeck; Richard J Lechtenberg; Roxanne Kerani
Journal:  J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 1.809

5.  Understanding attitudes, barriers and challenges in a small island nation to disease and partner notification for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections: a qualitative study.

Authors:  O Peter Adams; Anne O Carter; Lynda Redwood-Campbell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Informed recruitment in partner studies of HIV transmission: an ethical issue in couples research.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Elisa J Gordon; Anneli Uusküla
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.