OBJECTIVE: The intrinsic differences of water and fat protons in the MR environment allow selective interrogation of their contribution to the MR signal. Fat-suppression techniques and chemical shift imaging are routinely used in clinical body MRI. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) is a novel imaging technique for separating fat and water. CONCLUSION: This article describes the basic principles of IDEAL MRI and illustrates the use of IDEAL imaging as an alternative to fat-suppression techniques and chemical shift imaging for body MRI.
OBJECTIVE: The intrinsic differences of water and fat protons in the MR environment allow selective interrogation of their contribution to the MR signal. Fat-suppression techniques and chemical shift imaging are routinely used in clinical body MRI. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) is a novel imaging technique for separating fat and water. CONCLUSION: This article describes the basic principles of IDEAL MRI and illustrates the use of IDEAL imaging as an alternative to fat-suppression techniques and chemical shift imaging for body MRI.
Authors: Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Fabian Springer; Jürgen Machann; Claus D Claussen; Fritz Schick; Nina F Schwenzer Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Nayela N Keen; Cynthia T Chin; John W Engstrom; David Saloner; Lynne S Steinbach Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Shu Zhang; Stephen Seiler; Xinzeng Wang; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Jochen Keupp; Emily E Knippa; Robert E Lenkinski; Elena Vinogradov Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nicola Schieda; Matthew S Davenport; Ivan Pedrosa; Atul Shinagare; Hersch Chandarana; Nicole Curci; Ankur Doshi; Gary Israel; Erick Remer; Jane Wang; Stuart G Silverman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Y Kaichi; K Tanitame; H Itakura; H Ohno; M Yoneda; Y Takahashi; Y Akiyama; K Awai Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 3.825