BACKGROUND & AIMS: The gastroenterology core curriculum (GCC) represents the knowledge/skills desired at the completion of fellowship training. The hepatology subset (H-GCC) is the focus of this research. The aims were to measure adherence of the H-GCC within gastrointestinal training programs, compare the perceptions of the H-GCC compliance by fellows and program directors, and provide comparative information to improve gastrointestinal training programs. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess the general and hepatology components of the GCC. Fellows and program directors were invited to participate by means of 3 sequential mailings. Pearson chi(2) and Fisher exact tests were used for statistics. RESULTS: Of 971 potential respondents, the questionnaire was returned by 42% of program directors and 33% of fellows. There was <70% agreement by either fellows or program directors for minimum > or =18 months of clinical training (minimum > or =30% hepatology), and minimum > or =20 paracentesis/liver biopsies. Most prescribed hepatology core topics were covered; however, >10% of fellows claimed deficiency in physiology, pregnancy issues, angiography, immunosuppressant use, and congenital disorders. Fellows in non-liver transplant institutions more often reported lack of training in fulminant disease, transplant patient selection, and diagnosis/management of rejection (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Fellow and program director assessments were highly concordant, with most H-GCC criteria being met. (2) Attention is required to provide adequate time for clinical training and prescribed procedures. (3) Improved instruction in several hepatology topics seems warranted. (4) A nonevaluative questionnaire is a practical means to measure compliance. Future studies measuring compliance with other components of the GCC by using this methodology seem feasible.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The gastroenterology core curriculum (GCC) represents the knowledge/skills desired at the completion of fellowship training. The hepatology subset (H-GCC) is the focus of this research. The aims were to measure adherence of the H-GCC within gastrointestinal training programs, compare the perceptions of the H-GCC compliance by fellows and program directors, and provide comparative information to improve gastrointestinal training programs. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess the general and hepatology components of the GCC. Fellows and program directors were invited to participate by means of 3 sequential mailings. Pearson chi(2) and Fisher exact tests were used for statistics. RESULTS: Of 971 potential respondents, the questionnaire was returned by 42% of program directors and 33% of fellows. There was <70% agreement by either fellows or program directors for minimum > or =18 months of clinical training (minimum > or =30% hepatology), and minimum > or =20 paracentesis/liver biopsies. Most prescribed hepatology core topics were covered; however, >10% of fellows claimed deficiency in physiology, pregnancy issues, angiography, immunosuppressant use, and congenital disorders. Fellows in non-liver transplant institutions more often reported lack of training in fulminant disease, transplant patient selection, and diagnosis/management of rejection (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: (1) Fellow and program director assessments were highly concordant, with most H-GCC criteria being met. (2) Attention is required to provide adequate time for clinical training and prescribed procedures. (3) Improved instruction in several hepatology topics seems warranted. (4) A nonevaluative questionnaire is a practical means to measure compliance. Future studies measuring compliance with other components of the GCC by using this methodology seem feasible.
Authors: Jeffrey H Barsuk; Elaine R Cohen; John A Vozenilek; Lanty M O'Connor; William C McGaghie; Diane B Wayne Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2012-03