Literature DB >> 18356102

The effect of pitch dimensions on heart rate responses and technical demands of small-sided soccer games in elite players.

David M Kelly1, Barry Drust.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of changes in pitch size on heart rate responses and technical requirements of small-sided soccer games. Eight male soccer players participated in the study (mean+/-S.D.; age 18+/-1 years, height 1.80+/-0.1 m, weight 73.3+/-6.2 kg, estimated VO2peak 50.0+/-3.2 ml kg(-1) min(-1)). All players participated in small-sided games on three different pitch sizes (SSG1, 30 m x 20 m; SSG2, 40 m x 30 m; SSG3, 50 m x 40 m). Games consisted of 4 x 4 min of game play, interspersed by 2 min of active recovery. Heart rate measurements were made using a team-based monitoring system. Each game was also filmed to evaluate the technical actions. These tapes were analysed using a hand notation system. Mean+/-S.D. heart rates for the three games were not significantly different between conditions (SSG1, 175+/-9; SSG2, 173+/-11; SSG3, 169+/-6). The technical actions that changed as a result of changes in pitch size were the number of tackles (SSG1, 45+/-10; SSG2, 15+/-4; P<0.05) and shots (SSG1, 85+/-15; SSG 2, 60+/-18; SSG3, 44+/-9; P<0.05). Comparisons between the four 4 min intervals of game play indicated significant differences for both heart rate responses and the technical demands. These results demonstrate that changes in pitch size do not alter heart rate or the majority of technical requirements observed within small-sided games.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18356102     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  40 in total

1.  Effects of small-sided games on physical conditioning and performance in young soccer players.

Authors:  Athanasios Katis; Eleftherios Kellis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Aerobic conditioning for team sport athletes.

Authors:  Nicholas M Stone; Andrew E Kilding
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Physiology of small-sided games training in football: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen V Hill-Haas; Brian Dawson; Franco M Impellizzeri; Aaron J Coutts
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effects of Spatiotemporal Constraints and Age on the Interactions of Soccer Players when Competing for Ball Possession.

Authors:  Marcos R T P Menuchi; Antônio R P Moro; Paulo E Ambrósio; César A B Pariente; Duarte Araújo
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Effect of Court Dimensions on Players' External and Internal Load during Small-Sided Handball Games.

Authors:  Matteo Corvino; Antonio Tessitore; Carlo Minganti; Marko Sibila
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  The effects of man-marking on work intensity in small-sided soccer games.

Authors:  Jake K Ngo; Man-Chung Tsui; Andrew W Smith; Christopher Carling; Gar-Sun Chan; Del P Wong
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Small-Sided Games are More Enjoyable Than High-Intensity Interval Training of Similar Exercise Intensity in Soccer.

Authors:  Okba Selmi; Ibrahim Ouergui; Danielle E Levitt; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Beat Knechtle; Anissa Bouassida
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2020-03-04

8.  A review on the effects of soccer small-sided games.

Authors:  Marco Aguiar; Goreti Botelho; Carlos Lago; Victor Maças; Jaime Sampaio
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  A comparison of physiological responses to various intermittent and continuous small-sided games in young soccer players.

Authors:  Yusuf Köklü
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.193

10.  Influence of the Numbers of Players in the Heart Rate Responses of Youth Soccer Players Within 2 vs. 2, 3 vs. 3 and 4 vs. 4 Small-sided Games.

Authors:  A Dellal; R Jannault; M Lopez-Segovia; V Pialoux
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.