Literature DB >> 18355588

Reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects using the guided-bone regeneration technique with polylactide membranes and/or autogenous bone graft: a preliminary study on the influence of membrane permeability.

Cassio E Sverzut1, Paulo E P Faria, Carolina M Magdalena, Alexandre E Trivellato, Francisco V Mello-Filho, Cleber A J Paccola, Sylwester Gogolewski, Luiz A Salata.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bone maintenance after mandibular reconstruction with autogenous iliac crest may be disappointing due to extensive resorption in the long term. The potential of the guided-bone regeneration (GBR) technique to enhance the healing process in segmental defects lacks comprehensive scientific documentation. This study aimed to investigate the influence of polylactide membrane permeability on the fate of iliac bone graft (BG) used to treat mandibular segmental defects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unilateral 10-mm-wide segmental defects were created through the mandibles of 34 mongrel dogs. All defects were mechanically stabilized, and the animals were divided into 6 treatment groups: control, BG alone, microporous membrane (poly L/DL-lactide 80/20%) (Mi); Mi plus BG; microporous laser-perforated (15 cm(2) ratio) membrane (Mip), and Mip plus BG. Calcein fluorochrome was injected intravenously at 3 months, and animal euthanasia was carried out at 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Histomorphometry showed that BG protected by Mip was consistently related to larger amounts of bone compared with other groups (P <or= .0001). No difference was found between defects treated with Mip alone and BG alone. Mi alone rendered the least bone area and reduced the amount of grafted bone to control levels. Data from bone labeling indicated that the bone formation process was incipient in the BG group at 3 months postoperatively regardless of whether or not it was covered by membrane. In contrast, GBR with Mip tended to enhance bone formation activity at 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Mip alone could be a useful alternative to BG. The combination of Mip membrane and BG efficiently delivered increased bone amounts in segmental defects compared with other treatment modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18355588     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  8 in total

1.  Fabrication, vascularization and osteogenic properties of a novel synthetic biomimetic induced membrane for the treatment of large bone defects.

Authors:  Liling Ren; Yunqing Kang; Christopher Browne; Julius Bishop; Yunzhi Yang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  A bioresorbable polylactide implant used in bone cyst filling.

Authors:  Krzysztof Ficek; Jolanta Filipek; Piotr Wojciechowski; Konrad Kopec; Stodolak-Zych Ewa; Stanislaw Blazewicz
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Development of an experimental model of infected bone void in the ulna of rabbits.

Authors:  Matheus Lemos Azi; Mauricio Kfuri Junior; Roberto Martinez; Luis Antonio Salata; Cleber Antonio Jansen Paccola
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

4.  Antibody-Mediated Osseous Regeneration for Bone Tissue Engineering in Canine Segmental Defects.

Authors:  A Khojasteh; S Hosseinpour; M M Dehghan; F Mashhadiabbas; M Rezai Rad; S Ansari; S Farzad Mohajeri; H H Zadeh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elgali; Omar Omar; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.612

Review 6.  The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Rozalia Dimitriou; George I Mataliotakis; Giorgio Maria Calori; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Surgical Approaches Based on Biological Objectives: GTR versus GBR Techniques.

Authors:  Gaia Pellegrini; Giorgio Pagni; Giulio Rasperini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-06-13

Review 8.  Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?

Authors:  Omar Omar; Ibrahim Elgali; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 8.728

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.