Literature DB >> 18355519

Left ventricular reverse remodeling after undersized mitral ring annuloplasty in patients with ischemic regurgitation.

Sandro Gelsomino1, Roberto Lorusso, Irene Capecchi, Carlo Rostagno, Stefano Romagnoli, Giuseppe Billè, Giuseppe De Cicco, Cecilia Tetta, Pierluigi Stefàno, Gian Franco Gensini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term durability of combined coronary artery bypass grafting and of undersized mitral ring annuloplasty (UMRA) is uncertain. A considerable number of patients show recurrent regurgitation. This study examines the difference in the benefit of UMRA on clinical end points and recurrence of mitral regurgitation between responders and nonresponders of left ventricular reverse remodeling.
METHODS: Study eligibility criteria were fulfilled by 204 patients with chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation (CIMR) who survived combined coronary artery bypass grafting and reductive annuloplasty between September 2001 and September 2006. Patients underwent echocardiography preoperatively, at discharge, and at follow-up appointments (100% complete). Median early follow-up was 6 months (interquartile range [IRQ], 3 to 8 months; late follow-up, 35 months (IRQ, 21 to 50 months). Reverse remodeling was considered a reduction in left ventricular end systolic volume index exceeding 15%.
RESULTS: There were 84 responders (41.2%) of reverse remodeling (age, 68 +/- 7.4 years; 51 men) and 120 nonresponders (58.8%; age, 67 +/- 7.6 years; 78 men). Nonresponders had a higher recurrence of mitral regurgitation (p < 0.001), higher reoperation rate for failed repair (p < 0.001), and significantly larger left ventricular volumes and dimension at any study point (p < 0.001), with significant late increase of sphericity indexes exceeding preoperative values (p < 0.001). At multivariable analysis, a baseline myocardial performance index of less than 0.90 (p < 0.001), a systolic sphericity index of less than 0.72 (p < 0.001), and wall motion score index of less than 1.59 (p = 0.003) were independent predictors of reverse remodeling.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that more information on possible echo predictors of an inadequate result may improve preoperative decision making of CIMR patients for UMRA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18355519     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

Review 1.  Surgical approach to mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure: when is it an option?

Authors:  Juan A Crestanello
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-03

2.  Influence of patient age on procedural selection in mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Mani A Daneshmand; Carmelo A Milano; J Scott Rankin; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; R Duane Davis; Walter G Wolfe; Donald D Glower; Peter K Smith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation: lessons from the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network randomized study.

Authors:  Christos G Mihos; Orlando Santana
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Treatment and management of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Michele De Bonis; Francesco Maisano; Giovanni La Canna; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Elimination of ischemic mitral regurgitation does not alter long-term left ventricular remodeling in the ovine model.

Authors:  Kanji Matsuzaki; Masato Morita; Hirotsugu Hamamoto; Mio Noma; J Daniel Robb; Matthew J Gillespie; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Topographic mapping of left ventricular regional contractile injury in ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Timothy S Lancaster; Julia Kar; Brian P Cupps; Matthew C Henn; Kevin Kulshrestha; Danielle J Koerner; Michael K Pasque
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 7.  Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Valve Repair Versus Replacement.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Sahil Agrawal; Sunny Goel; Jeffrey S Borer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Mitral valve repair and subvalvular intervention for secondary mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled and propensity matched studies.

Authors:  Christos G Mihos; Steve Xydas; Evin Yucel; Romain Capoulade; Roy F Williams; Maurice Mawad; Guillermo Garcia; Orlando Santana
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance for evaluation of mitral regurgitation prior to mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Neil K Mehta; Jiwon Kim; Jonathan Y Siden; Sara Rodriguez-Diego; Javid Alakbarli; Antonino Di Franco; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Surgical therapy for mitral regurgitation: the key to preventing heart failure?

Authors:  Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.