OBJECTIVE: To assess variation in safety climate across VA hospitals nationally. STUDY SETTING: Data were collected from employees at 30 VA hospitals over a 6-month period using the Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organizations survey. STUDY DESIGN: We sampled 100 percent of senior managers and physicians and a random 10 percent of other employees. At 10 randomly selected hospitals, we sampled an additional 100 percent of employees working in units with intrinsically higher hazards (high-hazard units [HHUs]). DATA COLLECTION: Data were collected using an anonymous survey design. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We received 4,547 responses (49 percent response rate). The percent problematic response--lower percent reflecting higher levels of patient safety climate--ranged from 12.0-23.7 percent across hospitals (mean=17.5 percent). Differences in safety climate emerged by management level, clinician status, and workgroup. Supervisors and front-line staff reported lower levels of safety climate than senior managers; clinician responses reflected lower levels of safety climate than those of nonclinicians; and responses of employees in HHUs reflected lower levels of safety climate than those of workers in other areas. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic study of patient safety climate in VA hospitals. Findings indicate an overall positive safety climate across the VA, but there is room for improvement.
OBJECTIVE: To assess variation in safety climate across VA hospitals nationally. STUDY SETTING: Data were collected from employees at 30 VA hospitals over a 6-month period using the Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organizations survey. STUDY DESIGN: We sampled 100 percent of senior managers and physicians and a random 10 percent of other employees. At 10 randomly selected hospitals, we sampled an additional 100 percent of employees working in units with intrinsically higher hazards (high-hazard units [HHUs]). DATA COLLECTION: Data were collected using an anonymous survey design. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We received 4,547 responses (49 percent response rate). The percent problematic response--lower percent reflecting higher levels of patient safety climate--ranged from 12.0-23.7 percent across hospitals (mean=17.5 percent). Differences in safety climate emerged by management level, clinician status, and workgroup. Supervisors and front-line staff reported lower levels of safety climate than senior managers; clinician responses reflected lower levels of safety climate than those of nonclinicians; and responses of employees in HHUs reflected lower levels of safety climate than those of workers in other areas. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic study of patient safety climate in VA hospitals. Findings indicate an overall positive safety climate across the VA, but there is room for improvement.
Authors: P J Pronovost; B Weast; C G Holzmueller; B J Rosenstein; R P Kidwell; K B Haller; E R Feroli; J B Sexton; H R Rubin Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2003-12
Authors: John B Sexton; Robert L Helmreich; Torsten B Neilands; Kathy Rowan; Keryn Vella; James Boyden; Peter R Roberts; Eric J Thomas Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Sara J Singer; Christine W Hartmann; Amresh Hanchate; Shibei Zhao; Mark Meterko; Priti Shokeen; Shoutzu Lin; David M Gaba; Amy K Rosen Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Glenn B Robert; Janet E Anderson; Susan J Burnett; Karina Aase; Boel Andersson-Gare; Roland Bal; Johan Calltorp; Francisco Nunes; Anne-Marie Weggelaar; Charles A Vincent; Naomi J Fulop Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 2.655