Literature DB >> 18354141

Primary anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary 2-year prospective study.

Freddie H Fu1, Wei Shen, James S Starman, Nnamdi Okeke, James J Irrgang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The anterior cruciate ligament consists of 2 functional bundles, the anteromedial bundle and the posterolateral bundle. Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is the current standard for the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. However, a significant subset of patients continues to report residual symptoms of instability after such reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may more closely restore normal kinematics of the knee by reproducing the native anatomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: We report the current clinical outcomes of the initial 100 consecutive patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an average follow-up of 2.1 +/- 0.5 years. All patients were prospectively followed to document range of motion, ligamentous laxity, and functional strength, as well as activity and sports participation.
RESULTS: Side-to-side difference in range of motion was 2 degrees +/- 3 degrees for extension and 2 degrees +/- 5 degrees for flexion. Sixty-five percent of patients had a normal Lachman test result, and 33% were nearly normal. For the pivot-shift test findings, 94% were normal, and 6% were nearly normal. The average side-to-side difference in the KT-2000 arthrometer test was 1.0 +/- 2.3 mm. There were 8 graft failures, 7 of which had subsequent revision surgery. No patients reported pain, swelling, or instability during activities of daily living, and 73% to 78% had no symptoms during very strenuous or strenuous sports activities. The scores of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form, Activities of Daily Living, and Sports Activity Scores of the Knee Outcome Survey were 85.0, 91.8, and 87.0, respectively, and were similar compared with patients undergoing single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, which we have previously reported. Fifty-one percent described their current activity level as normal, and 35% reported it as nearly normal.
CONCLUSION: Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction results in good restoration of joint stability and patient-reported outcomes when evaluated 2 years after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18354141     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508314428

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  66 in total

1.  Avoiding tunnel collisions between fibular collateral ligament and ACL posterolateral bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Michele D'Arienzo; Giovanni Palermo Patera; Leone Filosto; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical comparison of three anatomic ACL reconstructions in a porcine model.

Authors:  Aníbal Debandi; Akira Maeyama; Songcen Lu; Chad Hume; Shigehiro Asai; Bunsei Goto; Yuichi Hoshino; Patrick Smolinski; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings.

Authors:  Tommi Kiekara; Timo Järvelä; Heini Huhtala; Antti Paakkala
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Histological analysis of the tibial anterior cruciate ligament insertion.

Authors:  Shinya Oka; Peter Schuhmacher; Axel Brehmer; Ulrike Traut; Joachim Kirsch; Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Flat ACL anatomy: fact no fiction.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Secure fixation of femoral bone plug with a suspensory button in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Shuji Taketomi; Hiroshi Inui; Kensuke Nakamura; Ryota Yamagami; Keitaro Tahara; Takaki Sanada; Hironari Masuda; Sakae Tanaka; Takumi Nakagawa
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 7.  Clinically relevant anatomy and what anatomic reconstruction means.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Samuel G Moulton; Marco Nitri; Werner Mueller; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study in rabbits.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Nicolas Efstathopoulos; Ioannis Sourlas; Anastasia Pilichou; Georgios Papachristou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Volker Musahl; Scott Tashman; Michal Szczodry; Wei Shen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Anatomic Double Bundle single tunnel Foreign Material Free ACL-Reconstruction - a technical note.

Authors:  Gernot Felmet
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.