BACKGROUND: Patients are at risk of second malignancies (SM) after treatment for Ewing sarcoma family of tumours (ESFT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 237 patients with ESFT treated at our institution from September 1979 through to February 2004. Cumulative incidence (CI) of SM by the type of malignancy and treatment was estimated. RESULTS:Twelve patients with SM were identified. Secondary leukaemia (SL) developed in 8 patients (2 ALL, 6 MDS/AML), a median 2.6 years (range 1.4-19.6 years) after diagnosis of ESFT. Four patients had secondary solid tumours, a median 8.0 years (range 7.4-9.4 years) after the ESFT diagnosis. Five- and 10-year estimates of the CI of SM were 3.0+/-1.1% and 4.7+/-1.5%, respectively. Patients treated on recent protocols with higher cumulative doses or an increased dose intensity of alkylators and epipodophyllotoxins and the use of G-CSF had a higher estimated CI of SL than those in earlier studies (5-year CI 6.4+/-2.4% versus 0.0+/-0.0%, respectively, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESFT are at risk for SM after treatment. The cumulative incidence of SM is higher with the current treatment protocols and may be related to the intensification of chemotherapeutic agents.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients are at risk of second malignancies (SM) after treatment for Ewing sarcoma family of tumours (ESFT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 237 patients with ESFT treated at our institution from September 1979 through to February 2004. Cumulative incidence (CI) of SM by the type of malignancy and treatment was estimated. RESULTS: Twelve patients with SM were identified. Secondary leukaemia (SL) developed in 8 patients (2 ALL, 6 MDS/AML), a median 2.6 years (range 1.4-19.6 years) after diagnosis of ESFT. Four patients had secondary solid tumours, a median 8.0 years (range 7.4-9.4 years) after the ESFT diagnosis. Five- and 10-year estimates of the CI of SM were 3.0+/-1.1% and 4.7+/-1.5%, respectively. Patients treated on recent protocols with higher cumulative doses or an increased dose intensity of alkylators and epipodophyllotoxins and the use of G-CSF had a higher estimated CI of SL than those in earlier studies (5-year CI 6.4+/-2.4% versus 0.0+/-0.0%, respectively, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with ESFT are at risk for SM after treatment. The cumulative incidence of SM is higher with the current treatment protocols and may be related to the intensification of chemotherapeutic agents.
Authors: M Paulussen; S Ahrens; M Lehnert; D Taeger; H W Hense; A Wagner; J Dunst; D Harms; A Reiter; G Henze; C Niemeyer; U Göbel; B Kremens; U R Fölsch; W E Aulitzky; P A Voûte; A Zoubek; H Jürgens Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: C Rodriguez-Galindo; C A Poquette; N M Marina; D R Head; A Cain; W H Meyer; V M Santana; A S Pappo Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2000 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: M A Tucker; G J D'Angio; J D Boice; L C Strong; F P Li; M Stovall; B J Stone; D M Green; F Lombardi; W Newton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1987-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G Bacci; M Mercuri; A Longhi; F Bertoni; E Barbieri; D Donati; S Giacomini; P Bacchini; E Pignotti; C Forni; S Ferrari Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Dorothy R Barnard; Beverley Lange; Todd A Alonzo; Jonathan Buckley; J Nathan Kobrinsky; Stuart Gold; Steven Neudorf; Jean Sanders; Laura Burden; William G Woods Journal: Blood Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Maurizio Ghisoli; Minal Barve; Robert Mennel; Carl Lenarsky; Staci Horvath; Gladice Wallraven; Beena O Pappen; Sam Whiting; Donald Rao; Neil Senzer; John Nemunaitis Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Aimee C Talleur; Fariba Navid; Sheri L Spunt; M Beth McCarville; John Wu; Shenghua Mao; Andrew M Davidoff; Michael D Neel; Matthew J Krasin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 7.038