Mamdouh M Koraitim1. 1. Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We determined the influence of bulbar urethral length on the anastomotic repair approach to bulboprostatic urethral distraction defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and radiographic studies of 120 patients 6 to 52 years old who had undergone anastomotic repair of bulboprostatic urethral gaps. Repair was accomplished by a simple perineal operation in 84 patients (group 1) and an elaborated perineal or a transpubic procedure in 36 (group 2). The length of the urethral gap and bulbar urethra was measured on preoperative urethrogram. Also, the length of the urethral gap as a fraction of bulbar urethral length (index of elastic lengthening) was calculated. RESULTS: Mean length of the urethral gap was 1.5 cm in group 1 vs 4.2 cm in group 2 (p <0.001). Mean bulbar urethral length was 7.3 cm in group 1 vs 6.6 cm in group 2 (p >0.05). The mean index of elastic lengthening was 0.21 (range 0.06 to 0.34) in group 1 vs 0.64 (range 0.38 to 0.88) in group 2 (p <0.001). The difference in the mean length of the urethral gap between children and adults in the 2 groups was not statistically significant (2.4 vs 2.5 cm, p >0.05), while the difference in the mean length of the bulbar urethra was highly significant (5.6 vs 7.7 cm, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bulboprostatic urethral gaps shorter than a third of bulbar urethral length are usually corrected by a simple perineal operation. For longer gaps an elaborated perineal or transpubic procedure is usually done. Also, the latter 2 procedures are more commonly performed in children than in adults because of the shorter bulbar urethra.
PURPOSE: We determined the influence of bulbar urethral length on the anastomotic repair approach to bulboprostatic urethral distraction defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and radiographic studies of 120 patients 6 to 52 years old who had undergone anastomotic repair of bulboprostatic urethral gaps. Repair was accomplished by a simple perineal operation in 84 patients (group 1) and an elaborated perineal or a transpubic procedure in 36 (group 2). The length of the urethral gap and bulbar urethra was measured on preoperative urethrogram. Also, the length of the urethral gap as a fraction of bulbar urethral length (index of elastic lengthening) was calculated. RESULTS: Mean length of the urethral gap was 1.5 cm in group 1 vs 4.2 cm in group 2 (p <0.001). Mean bulbar urethral length was 7.3 cm in group 1 vs 6.6 cm in group 2 (p >0.05). The mean index of elastic lengthening was 0.21 (range 0.06 to 0.34) in group 1 vs 0.64 (range 0.38 to 0.88) in group 2 (p <0.001). The difference in the mean length of the urethral gap between children and adults in the 2 groups was not statistically significant (2.4 vs 2.5 cm, p >0.05), while the difference in the mean length of the bulbar urethra was highly significant (5.6 vs 7.7 cm, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bulboprostatic urethral gaps shorter than a third of bulbar urethral length are usually corrected by a simple perineal operation. For longer gaps an elaborated perineal or transpubic procedure is usually done. Also, the latter 2 procedures are more commonly performed in children than in adults because of the shorter bulbar urethra.