Literature DB >> 18351304

[Molecular biological detection of pathogens in patients with sepsis. Potentials, limitations and perspectives].

K-P Hunfeld1, T Bingold, V Brade, H Wissing.   

Abstract

The wide variability of clinical symptoms and the ongoing difficulties concerning the rapid and specific laboratory diagnosis of sepsis, contribute to the fact that sepsis primarily remains a clinical diagnosis. To contribute to a more tailored antibiotic coverage of the patient early on in the course of the disease, modern diagnostic concepts favour the qualitative and quantitative molecular biological detection of blood stream pathogens directly from whole blood. This offers a very attractive alternative to the currently applied less sensitive and much more time-consuming blood culture-based laboratory methods. Moreover, recent study results suggest an increasing impact of molecular detection methods with short turn-around times for more effective treatment and better outcomes of patients with sepsis and septic shock. In the short term, such tests will not substitute conventional blood culture despite their superior rapidity and sensitivity, mainly because of higher cost. The amazing speed of ongoing scientific developments means, however, that techniques that might appear complicated, labour intensive, and costly today, will develop to become the future standards in the microbiological diagnosis of patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18351304     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-008-1345-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  49 in total

1.  The emerging power of molecular diagnostics: towards improved management of life-threatening infection.

Authors:  M J Struelens; R de Mendonça
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Evaluation of a triplex PCR assay to discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative Staphylococci and determine methicillin resistance from blood cultures.

Authors:  N Maes; J Magdalena; S Rottiers; Y De Gheldre; M J Struelens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Cost effective blood cultures--is it possible or impossible to modify behavior?

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Infect Control       Date:  1986-01

4.  The use of polymerase chain reaction to detect septicemia in critically ill patients.

Authors:  R T Cursons; E Jeyerajah; J W Sleigh
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality.

Authors:  D Pittet; D Tarara; R P Wenzel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Detection of bacteraemia in patients with fever and neutropenia using 16S rRNA gene amplification by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  B E Ley; C J Linton; D M Bennett; H Jalal; A B Foot; M R Millar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Etiologic diagnosis of infective endocarditis by broad-range polymerase chain reaction: a 3-year experience.

Authors:  Philipp Peter Bosshard; Andreas Kronenberg; Reinhard Zbinden; Christian Ruef; Erik Christian Böttger; Martin Altwegg
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Detection of Salmonella typhi in the blood of patients with typhoid fever by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  J H Song; H Cho; M Y Park; D S Na; H B Moon; C H Pai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Effect of antimicrobials on blood cultures in endocarditis.

Authors:  R McKenzie; L G Reimer
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.803

10.  The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee.

Authors:  J L Vincent; D J Bihari; P M Suter; H A Bruining; J White; M H Nicolas-Chanoin; M Wolff; R C Spencer; M Hemmer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.