Literature DB >> 18351065

Spatial characteristics of net methylmercury production hot spots in peatlands.

Carl P J Mitchell1, Brian A Branfireun, Randall K Kolka.   

Abstract

Many wetlands are sources of methylmercury (MeHg) to surface waters, yet little information exists about the distribution of MeHg within wetlands. Total mercury (THg) and MeHg in peat pore waters were studied in four peatlands in spring, summer, and fall 2005. Marked spatial variability in the distribution of MeHg, and %MeHg as a proxy for net MeHg production, was observed, with highest values occurring in discrete zones. We denote these zones "MeHg hot spots", defined as an area where the pore water %MeHg exceeded the 90th percentile of the data set (n=463) or >22% of THg as MeHg. MeHg hot spots occurred near the interface between peatland and the upland watershed with few exceptions. The %MeHg in pore water was significantly less in peatland interiors compared to upland-peatland interface zones, with the significance of these differences related to the delineation of the boundary between the two areas. Although further research is necessary, our data suggest that the occurrence of MeHg hot spots is related to the transport of solutes in upland runoff to the peatland perimeter and not to the accumulation of MeHg in this zone as a result of transport from either the peatland interior or the surrounding upland watershed. These findings augment the understanding of peatland MeHg production in upland-peatland watersheds, provide guidance for more accurate quantification of MeHg pool sizes in the landscape, and a spatial framework forthe further study of mercury methylation processes in peatlands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18351065     DOI: 10.1021/es0704986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Biogeochemical controls on mercury methylation in the Allequash Creek wetland.

Authors:  Joel E Creswell; Martin M Shafer; Christopher L Babiarz; Sue-Zanne Tan; Abbey L Musinsky; Trevor H Schott; Eric E Roden; David E Armstrong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Spatial distribution and speciation of mercury and methyl mercury in the surface water of East River (Dongjiang) tributary of Pearl River Delta, South China.

Authors:  Jinling Liu; Xinbin Feng; Wei Zhu; Xian Zhang; Runsheng Yin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Detailed assessment of the kinetics of Hg-cell association, Hg methylation, and methylmercury degradation in several Desulfovibrio species.

Authors:  Andrew M Graham; Allyson L Bullock; Andrew C Maizel; Dwayne A Elias; Cynthia C Gilmour
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Mercury proxies and mercury dynamics in a forested watershed of the US Northeast.

Authors:  P Vidon; W Carleton; M J Mitchell
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  The influence of sulphate deposition on the seasonal variation of peat pore water methyl Hg in a boreal mire.

Authors:  Inger Bergman; Kevin Bishop; Qiang Tu; Wolfgang Frech; Staffan Åkerblom; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mercury in the soil of two contrasting watersheds in the eastern United States.

Authors:  Douglas A Burns; Laurel G Woodruff; Paul M Bradley; William F Cannon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The role of biogeochemical hotspots, landscape heterogeneity, and hydrological connectivity for minimizing forestry effects on water quality.

Authors:  Hjalmar Laudon; Lenka Kuglerová; Ryan A Sponseller; Martyn Futter; Annika Nordin; Kevin Bishop; Tomas Lundmark; Gustaf Egnell; Anneli M Ågren
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.129

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.