Literature DB >> 18350847

Local adverse effects of amalgam restorations.

M J McCullough1, M J Tyas.   

Abstract

Amalgam has been used for the restoration of teeth for well over 100 years, and is the most successful of the direct restorative materials with respect to longevity. Despite the increasing use of tooth-coloured materials, with advantages of aesthetics and adhesion, amalgam is one of the most widely used dental restorative materials. One of the principal disadvantages of amalgam, apart from aesthetics, is that it may have adverse biological effects, both locally and systemically. Locally, it can cause an erythematous lesion on the adjacent oral soft tissues (tongue and buccal mucosa), and systemically free mercury in the amalgam may give rise to a hypersensitivity reaction. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature concerning the local adverse reactions to dental amalgam. The focus will be on the reactions of the oral mucosa, and brief consideration will be given to laboratory cytotoxicity of dental amalgam and its components, and to the 'amalgam tattoo'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18350847     DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2008.tb00170.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Dent J        ISSN: 0020-6539            Impact factor:   2.512


  7 in total

1.  Amalgam tattoo: a cause of sinusitis?

Authors:  José Luiz Santos Parizi; Gisele Alborghetti Nai
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  The dental amalgam toxicity fear: a myth or actuality.

Authors:  Monika Rathore; Archana Singh; Vandana A Pant
Journal:  Toxicol Int       Date:  2012-05

Review 3.  Unmet diagnostic needs in contact oral mucosal allergies.

Authors:  Paola Lucia Minciullo; Giovanni Paolino; Maddalena Vacca; Sebastiano Gangemi; Eustachio Nettis
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2016-09-01

4.  Healing of Oral Lichenoid Lesions following Replacement of Dental Amalgam Restorations with Feldspathic Ceramic Inlay-Onlay Restorations: Clinical Results of a Follow-Up Period Varied from Three Months up to Five Years.

Authors:  Burcin Karatasli; Gokcen Karatasli; Ozgur Mete; Mehmet Ali Erdem; Abdulkadir Burak Cankaya
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Laser treatment of oral mucosa tattoo.

Authors:  Mirjana Gojkov-Vukelic; Sanja Hadzic; Enes Pasic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2011-12

6.  A case report: retigabine induced oral mucosal dyspigmentation of the hard palate.

Authors:  Nicholas G Beacher; Martin J Brodie; Christine Goodall
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Effects of Removal Conditions on Mercury Amount Remaining in the Oral Cavity and inside Drainage System after Removing Dental Amalgams.

Authors:  Yoshiki Ishida; Harumi Aoki; Taira Miyasaka; Yusuke Aoyagi; Daisuke Miura; Akikazu Shinya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.