Literature DB >> 18350731

Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Chih-Hwa Chen1.   

Abstract

Successful posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is challenging because of the complex structures and difficult reconstruction techniques that are required. The reported results have been inconsistent. Variables that affect the results of surgery to restore PCL function include combined associated ligaments injury, difficulty to duplicate PCL anatomy, wide variation in broad femoral insertion footprint, difficulty in accurate placement of the transtibial tunnel, tunnel erosion, high internal graft stresses and graft elongation. The outcome of conservative treatment of isolated PCL injuries with mild or moderate laxity is generally acceptable. However, more severe straight posterior laxity or combined injury patterns usually lead to a worse prognosis. Surgical reconstruction for PCL can achieve satisfactory results for most patients if adequate surgical principles and techniques are followed. Recent studies on the anatomy and the biomechanics of PCL have led to a better understanding of its biomechanical properties for the reconstruction. It has been generally agreed that surgical reconstruction is indicated for symptomatic severe posterior knee instability and multiple ligament injuries for better functional recovery after PCL injuries. Accepted surgical techniques for the treatment of PCL tears include primary repair for PCL avulsion fracture, as well as open or arthroscopic reconstruction using the transtibial or tibial inlay technique. Controversy continues over the choice of graft tissue, one or two bundle reconstruction, location of tunnel placement, knee position when securing the graft, and fixation technique. From the accumulated clinical experience and surgical concepts in clinical practice, we have developed various surgical techniques to improve the outcomes of reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18350731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chang Gung Med J        ISSN: 2072-0939


  6 in total

1.  Clinical outcome after reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Odd Arve Lien; Emilie Jul-Larsen Aas; Steinar Johansen; Tom Clement Ludvigsen; Wender Figved; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Posterior knee pain.

Authors:  S English; D Perret
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2010-06-12

Review 3.  Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures.

Authors:  Anna Katsman; Eric J Strauss; Kirk A Campbell; Michael J Alaia
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

4.  Anterior arthroscopic-assisted fixation of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Xuan Gong; Mishra Rahul; Shukla Priyanka; Changdong Wang; Xi Liang; Guoliang Ding; Ning Hu
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 5.  Systematic review of cadaveric studies on anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the landmarks in anatomic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Dong Yeong Lee; Dong Hee Kim; Jin Sung Park; Dae Cheol Nam; Seong Hee Cho; Jin Hoon Jeong; Sun Chul Hwang
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-02

6.  Severe cartilage damage from a broken absorbable screw head after fixation of an avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament: A case report.

Authors:  Qiangqiang Li; Kai Song; Ye Sun; Haojun Zhang; Dongyang Chen; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.