Literature DB >> 18350413

Enhancement of face recognition learning in patients with brain injury using three cognitive training procedures.

Jane Powell1, Susan Letson, Jules Davidoff, Tim Valentine, Richard Greenwood.   

Abstract

Twenty patients with impairments of face recognition, in the context of a broader pattern of cognitive deficits, were administered three new training procedures derived from contemporary theories of face processing to enhance their learning of new faces: semantic association (being given additional verbal information about the to-be-learned faces); caricaturing (presentation of caricatured versions of the faces during training and veridical versions at recognition testing); and part recognition (focusing patients on distinctive features during the training phase). Using a within-subjects design, each training procedure was applied to a different set of 10 previously unfamiliar faces and entailed six presentations of each face. In a "simple exposure" control procedure (SE), participants were given six presentations of another set of faces using the same basic protocol but with no further elaboration. Order of the four procedures was counterbalanced, and each condition was administered on a different day. A control group of 12 patients with similar levels of face recognition impairment were trained on all four sets of faces under SE conditions. Compared to the SE condition, all three training procedures resulted in more accurate discrimination between the 10 studied faces and 10 distractor faces in a post-training recognition test. This did not reflect any intrinsic lesser memorability of the faces used in the SE condition, as evidenced by the comparable performance across face sets by the control group. At the group level, the three experimental procedures were of similar efficacy, and associated cognitive deficits did not predict which technique would be most beneficial to individual patients; however, there was limited power to detect such associations. Interestingly, a pure prosopagnosic patient who was tested separately showed benefit only from the part recognition technique. Possible mechanisms for the observed effects, and implications for rehabilitation, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18350413     DOI: 10.1080/09602010701419485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil        ISSN: 0960-2011            Impact factor:   2.868


  5 in total

Review 1.  Adolescent brain development, substance use, and psychotherapeutic change.

Authors:  Reagan Wetherill; Susan F Tapert
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2012-06-25

2.  The Reverse-Caricature Effect Revisited: Familiarization With Frontal Facial Caricatures Improves Veridical Face Recognition.

Authors:  Jobany Rodríguez; Heather Bortfeld; Isaac Rudomín; Benjamín Hernández; Ricardo Gutiérrez-Osuna
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 3.  Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: successes and failures over the last 50 years.

Authors:  Joseph M DeGutis; Christopher Chiu; Mallory E Grosso; Sarah Cohan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Progress in perceptual research: the case of prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Andrea Albonico; Jason Barton
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-05-31

Review 5.  The rehabilitation of face recognition impairments: a critical review and future directions.

Authors:  Sarah Bate; Rachel J Bennetts
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.