Literature DB >> 18349775

Repair of tibial nonunions and bone defects with the Taylor Spatial Frame.

S Robert Rozbruch1, Jacob S Pugsley, Austin T Fragomen, Svetlana Ilizarov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcomes of tibial nonunions and bone defects treated with the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) using the Ilizarov method.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Limb Lengthening and Deformity Service at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients with 38 tibial nonunions were treated with the TSF. There were 23 patients with bone defects (average 5.9 cm) and 22 patients with leg-length discrepancy (LLD) (average 3.1 cm) resulting in an average longitudinal deficiency (sum of bone defect and LLD) of 6.5 cm in 31 patients (1-16). The average number of previous surgeries was 4 (0-20). At the time of surgery, 19 (50%) nonunions were diagnosed as infected. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent repair of the nonunion and application of a TSF. Patients with bone loss were additionally treated with lengthening. Infected nonunions were treated with 6 weeks of culture-specific antibiotics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Bony union, time in frame, eradication of infection, leg-length discrepancy, deformity, Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) lower-limb scores, and Association for the Study of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) bone and functional results.
RESULTS: Bony union was achieved after the initial treatment in 27 (71%) patients. The presence of bone infection correlated with initial failure and persistent nonunion (P=0.03). The 11 persistent nonunions were re-treated with TSF reapplication in 4, intramedullary rodding in 3, plate fixation in 2, and amputation in 2 patients. This resulted in final bony union in 36 (95%) patients. The average LLD was 1.8 cm (0-6.8) (SD 2). Alignment with deformity less than 5 degrees was achieved in 32 patients and alignment between 6 degrees and 10 degrees was achieved in 4 patients. Significant improvement of Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores was noted in physical role (P=0.03) and physical function (P=0.001). AAOS lower-limb module scores significantly improved from 56 to 82 (P<0.001). ASAMI bone and functional outcomes were excellent or good in 36 and 34 patients, respectively. The number of previous surgeries correlated inversely with the ASAMI bone (P=0.003) and functional (P=0.001) scores.
CONCLUSIONS: One can comprehensively approach tibial nonunions with the TSF. This is particularly useful in the setting of stiff hypertrophic nonunion, infection, bone loss, LLD, and poor soft-tissue envelope. Infected nonunions have a higher risk of failure than noninfected cases. Treatment after fewer failed surgeries will lead to a better outcome. Internal fixation can be used to salvage initial failures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349775     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162ab49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  33 in total

1.  Clinical reliability of closed techniques and comparison with open strategies to achieve union at the docking site.

Authors:  Giovanni Lovisetti; Francesco Sala; Anna N Miller; Ahmed M Thabet; Vincenzo Zottola; Dario Capitani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Mechanical Influence of Surrounding Soft Tissue on Bone Regeneration Processes: A Bone Lengthening Study.

Authors:  Pablo Blázquez-Carmona; Juan Mora-Macías; José Antonio Sanz-Herrera; Juan Morgaz; Rocío Navarrete-Calvo; Jaime Domínguez; Esther Reina-Romo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Clinical value of the Taylor Spatial Frame: a comparison with the Ilizarov and Orthofix fixators.

Authors:  D Dammerer; K Kirschbichler; L Donnan; G Kaufmann; M Krismer; R Biedermann
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics May Not Reduce Pin Site Infections After External Fixation.

Authors:  Austin T Fragomen; Andy O Miller; Barry D Brause; Vladimir Goldman; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-12-27

5.  Does Integrated Fixation Provide Benefit in the Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Tibial Bone Defects?

Authors:  Mitchell Bernstein; Austin T Fragomen; Samir Sabharwal; Jonathan Barclay; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  [Prefabrication of bone transplants].

Authors:  M Jagodzinski; H Kokemüller; P Jehn; P Vogt; N-C Gellrich; C Krettek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Ilizarov fixator combined with an intramedullary nail for tibial nonunions with bone loss: is it effective?

Authors:  Deniz Gulabi; Mehmet Erdem; Gultekin Sıtkı Cecen; Cem Coskun Avci; Necdet Saglam; Fevzi Saglam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The management of tibial fracture non-union using the Taylor Spatial Frame.

Authors:  A Khunda; M Al-Maiyah; W G P Eardley; R Montgomery
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-07-14

9.  Ipsilateral fibular transport using Ilizarov-Taylor spatial frame for a limb salvage reconstruction: a case report.

Authors:  Raheel Shafi; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-11-26

10.  Does the Taylor Spatial Frame accurately correct tibial deformities?

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch; Kira Segal; Svetlana Ilizarov; Austin T Fragomen; Gabriel Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.