Literature DB >> 18349656

Success rate of gingivoperiosteoplasty with and without secondary bone grafts compared with secondary alveolar bone grafts alone.

Yuki Sato1, Barry H Grayson, Judah S Garfinkle, Ingrid Barillas, Koutaro Maki, Court B Cutting.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gingivoperiosteoplasty has been shown to eliminate the need for secondary alveolar bone grafting in 60 percent of patients. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic alveolar anatomy following infant gingivoperiosteoplasty, secondary alveolar bone grafting, and secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients who had prior infant gingivoperiosteoplasty with inadequate bone formation.
METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive nonsyndromic patients (complete bilateral cleft lip-cleft palate, n = 12; complete unilateral cleft lip-cleft palate, n = 46; complete unilateral cleft lip and alveolus, n = 14) treated at New York University Medical Center were available for evaluation. Eighty-two complete alveolar cleft sites were assigned to three groups: gingivoperiosteoplasty (n = 30), secondary alveolar bone grafting (n = 41), and secondary alveolar bone grafting following gingivoperiosteoplasty (n = 11). All gingivoperiosteoplasties were performed at the time of primary lip surgery, and secondary alveolar bone grafting (cancellous iliac crest at 7 to 12.5 years of age) was performed before eruption of the permanent canine. Radiographs were measured according to the modified method of Long.
RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of gingivoperiosteoplasty cases did not require secondary alveolar bone grafting and none had fistulas. The rate of missing teeth in the total sample, adjacent to the cleft, was within normal limits for the population. Group 1 alone and groups 1 and 3 combined had superior alveolar anatomy compared with group 2 (p < 0.01). No significant differences existed between groups 1 and 3 (p > 0.05). Crest height was best in group 1 (p < 0.01), followed by group 3 and then group 2, with no difference between the latter two groups.
CONCLUSION: Gingivoperiosteoplasty alone or combined with secondary alveolar bone grafting results in superior bone levels when compared with conventional secondary alveolar bone grafting alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349656     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000302461.56820.c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Unilateral cleft lip: principles and practice of surgical management.

Authors:  Raymond Tse
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Tissue engineering strategies for alveolar cleft reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nard G Janssen; Willem L J Weijs; Ronald Koole; Antoine J W P Rosenberg; Gert J Meijer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding of Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Infants: An Orthodontist's Point of View.

Authors:  Ayşe Tuba Altuğ
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Personal technique for primary repair of alveolar clefts.

Authors:  Hassan A Badran; Hazem M Ali; Amir S Elbarbary
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-03

Review 5.  Management of Alveolar Cleft.

Authors:  Hyunwoo Kyung; Nakheon Kang
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-08-11

6.  Regeneration in Experimental Alveolar Bone Defect Using Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Akiko Toyota; Rei Shinagawa; Mikiko Mano; Kazuyuki Tokioka; Naoto Suda
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  A novel technique for prevention of anterior fistula and facilitation of alveolar cleft repair: Gingivoperiosteoplasty with palatoplasty.

Authors:  Owais Ahmed; Sobia Yasmeen; Muhammad Imran Khan; Mirza Shehab Afzal Beg
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.340

8.  A novel experimental model for studying transverse orthodontic tooth movement in the rat mandible.

Authors:  Ayad Alsagheer; Loren W Kline; Michael R Doschak; Paul W Major
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Difference in the Surgical Outcome of Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients with and without Pre-Alveolar Bone Graft Orthodontic Treatment.

Authors:  Chun-Shin Chang; Christopher Glenn Wallace; Yen-Chang Hsiao; Yu-Ting Chiu; Betty Chien-Jung Pai; I-Ju Chen; Yu-Fang Liao; Eric Jen-Wein Liou; Philip Kuo-Ting Chen; Jyh-Ping Chen; M Samuel Noordhoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Bone Regeneration using Silk Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Composite in a Rat Alveolar Defect Model.

Authors:  Kyung S Koh; Jong Woo Choi; Eun Jeong Park; Tae Suk Oh
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.