Literature DB >> 18349451

MR imaging appearances of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Faisal Alyas1, Mark Curtis, Cathy Speed, Asif Saifuddin, David Connell.   

Abstract

The key structures involved in dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) are the joint itself and the strong accessory coracoclavicular ligament. ACJ dislocations are classified with the Rockwood system, which comprises six grades of injury. Treatment planning requires accurate grading of the ACJ disruption, but correct classification can be difficult with clinical assessment. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has a well-established role in evaluation of ACJ pain. MR imaging performed in the coronal oblique plane parallel to the distal clavicle allows assessment of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments owing to its in-plane orientation in relation to these structures. This technique enables distinction between grade 2 and grade 3 injuries, which can be difficult with conventional clinical and radiographic evaluation. In addition, diagnosis of grade 1 injuries is possible by demonstration of a ruptured superiodorsal acromioclavicular ligament. Resultant thickening of the acromioclavicular or coracoclavicular ligament allows identification of chronic ACJ injuries. (c) RSNA, 2008

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349451     DOI: 10.1148/rg.282075714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  24 in total

1.  Measure of horizontal and vertical displacement of the acromioclavicular joint after cutting ligament using X-ray and opto-electronic system.

Authors:  Goulven Rochcongar; Sébastien Emily; Benoit Lebel; Vincent Pineau; Gilles Burdin; Christophe Hulet
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  [Arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint: Hook plate versus arthroscopy].

Authors:  G Jensen; A Ellwein; C Voigt; J C Katthagen; H Lill
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Großterlinden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Clavicle and acromioclavicular joint injuries: a review of imaging, treatment, and complications.

Authors:  Yulia Melenevsky; Corrie M Yablon; Arun Ramappa; Mary G Hochman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Classifications in Brief: Rockwood Classification of Acromioclavicular Joint Separations.

Authors:  Jacob D Gorbaty; Jason E Hsu; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Arthrosis - update 2012].

Authors:  M Räuchle; M Cemerka; B Eibenberger; M Breitenseher
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Ultrasound of the coracoclavicular ligaments in the acute phase of an acromioclavicular disjonction: Comparison of radiographic, ultrasound and MRI findings.

Authors:  Marie Faruch Bilfeld; Franck Lapègue; Hélène Chiavassa Gandois; Marie Aurélie Bayol; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Nicolas Sans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  [Acromioclavicular injuries in professional athletes].

Authors:  M Tauber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  [Injuries of the acromioclavicular joint in athletes].

Authors:  N Kraus; M Scheibel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.