Literature DB >> 18349441

Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to determine inventory size for a national cord blood bank.

David H Howard1, David Meltzer, Craig Kollman, Martin Maiers, Brent Logan, Loren Gragert, Michelle Setterholm, Mary M Horowitz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transplantation with stem cells from stored umbilical cord blood units is an alternative to living unrelated bone marrow transplantation. The larger the inventory of stored cord units, the greater the likelihood that transplant candidates will match to a unit, but storing units is costly. The authors present the results of a study, commissioned by the Institute of Medicine, as part of a report on the establishment of a national cord blood bank, examining the optimal inventory level. They emphasize the unique challenges of undertaking cost-effectiveness analysis in this field and the contribution of the analysis to policy.
METHODS: The authors estimate the likelihood that transplant candidates will match to a living unrelated marrow donor or a cord blood unit as a function of cord blood inventory and then calculate the life-years gained for each transplant type by match level using historical data. They develop a model of the cord blood inventory level to estimate total costs as a function of the number of stored units.
RESULTS: The cost per life-year gained associated with increasing inventory from 50,000 to 100,000 units is $44,000 to $86,000 and from 100,000 to 150,000 units is $64,000 to $153,000, depending on the assumption about the degree to which survival rates for cord transplants vary by match quality.
CONCLUSION: Expanding the cord blood inventory above current levels is cost-effective by conventional standards. The analysis helped shape the Institute of Medicine's report, but it is difficult to determine the extent to which the analysis influenced subsequent congressional legislation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349441     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07308750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cord blood transplantation: state of the art.

Authors:  Eliane Gluckman; Vanderson Rocha
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Impact of long-term cryopreservation on single umbilical cord blood transplantation outcomes.

Authors:  Richard Mitchell; John E Wagner; Claudio G Brunstein; Qing Cao; David H McKenna; Troy C Lund; Michael R Verneris
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Towards responsible cord blood banking models.

Authors:  P Rebulla; L Lecchi
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  HLA match likelihoods for hematopoietic stem-cell grafts in the U.S. registry.

Authors:  Loren Gragert; Mary Eapen; Eric Williams; John Freeman; Stephen Spellman; Robert Baitty; Robert Hartzman; J Douglas Rizzo; Mary Horowitz; Dennis Confer; Martin Maiers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cord blood stem cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the UK: how big should the bank be?

Authors:  Sergio Querol; Ghulam J Mufti; Steven G E Marsh; Antonio Pagliuca; Ann-Margaret Little; Bronwen E Shaw; Robert Jeffery; Joan Garcia; John M Goldman; J Alejandro Madrigal
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation with cord blood for cure of HIV infections.

Authors:  Lawrence D Petz; Istvan Redei; Yvonne Bryson; Donna Regan; Joanne Kurtzberg; Elizabeth Shpall; Jonathan Gutman; Sergio Querol; Pamela Clark; Richard Tonai; Sarah Santos; Aide Bravo; Stephen Spellman; Loren Gragert; John Rossi; Shirley Li; Haitang Li; David Senitzer; John Zaia; Joseph Rosenthal; Stephen Forman; Robert Chow
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 5.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.