Literature DB >> 18349404

External validation of a biomarker-based preoperative nomogram predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Shahrokh F Shariat1, Jochen Walz, Claus G Roehrborn, Alexandre R Zlotta, Paul Perrotte, Nazareno Suardi, Fred Saad, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biomarker signatures currently are used in several malignancies to guide clinical decision making. Recently, preoperative plasma levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and interleukin-6 soluble receptor (IL6-SR) have improved the accuracy of a clinical nomogram that predicted biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. However, this model was never externally validated. We tested the accuracy of this nomogram in an independent, external cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Preoperative plasma levels of TGF-beta1 and IL6-SR were measured in 423 consecutive men who underwent radical prostatectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy and were used, along with preoperative prostate-specific antigen levels, biopsy Gleason sum, and clinical stage to determine nomogram-derived probabilities of biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years after radical prostatectomy. The accuracy of predictions was quantified with the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plots that graphically displayed the nomogram's performance characteristics. The statistical significance of the difference between the biomarker nomogram and a model designed on the basis of clinical variables alone was tested by using the Mantel-Haenszel statistic.
RESULTS: Biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 77.0% (95% CI, 72.0% to 82.0%). The biomarker-based nomogram was 87.9% accurate versus 71.1% for the nomogram designed on the basis of clinical variables alone (16.8% difference; P < .001). The performance characteristics of the biomarker-based nomogram were superior to those of the clinical nomogram.
CONCLUSION: We confirm that plasma levels of TGF-beta1 and IL6-SR considerably enhance the accuracy of the standard preoperative nomogram for the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. This model further refines our ability to identify patients at a high risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349404     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  25 in total

Review 1.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Risk factors: improved risk stratification for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hendrik Isbarn; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Use of nomograms for predictions of outcome in patients with advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Guilherme Godoy; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2009-04

Review 4.  Clinical and Novel Biomarkers in the Management of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Cristóbal Sanhueza; Manish Kohli
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-02-08

Review 5.  Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mira Keyes; Juanita Crook; Gerard Morton; Eric Vigneault; Nawaid Usmani; W James Morris
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Axel Semjonow; Hans Lilja; Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Platelet TSP-1 controls prostate cancer-induced osteoclast differentiation and bone marrow-derived cell mobilization through TGFβ-1.

Authors:  Bethany A Kerr; Koran S Harris; Lihong Shi; Jeffrey S Willey; David R Soto-Pantoja; Tatiana V Byzova
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 8.  Transforming growth factor-β: A therapeutic target for cancer.

Authors:  Sulsal Haque; John C Morris
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Retrospective analysis of prostate cancer recurrence potential with tissue metabolomic profiles.

Authors:  Andreas Maxeiner; Christen B Adkins; Yifen Zhang; Matthias Taupitz; Elkan F Halpern; W Scott McDougal; Chin-Lee Wu; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.