PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare diagnostic sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in carcinoid and islet cell tumor patients with a serotonin and a catecholamine precursor as tracers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Carcinoid (n = 24) or pancreatic islet cell tumor (n = 23) patients with at least one lesion on conventional imaging including somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) and computed tomography (CT) scan underwent (11)C-5-hydroxytryptophan ((11)C-5-HTP) PET and 6-[F-18]fluoro-L-dihydroxy-phenylalanine ((18)F-DOPA) PET. PET findings were compared with a composite reference standard derived from all available imaging along with clinical and cytologic/histologic information. RESULTS: In carcinoid tumor patients, per-patient analysis showed sensitivities for (11)C-5-HTP PET, (18)F-DOPA PET, SRS, and CT of 100%, 96%, 86%, 96%, respectively, and in islet cell tumors of 100%, 89%, 78%, 87%, respectively. In carcinoid patients, per-lesion analysis revealed sensitivities for (11)C-5-HTP PET, (11)C-5-HTP PET/CT, (18)F-DOPA PET, (18)F-DOPA PET/CT, SRS, SRS/CT, and CT alone of, respectively, 78%, 89%, 87%, 98%, 49%, 73%, and 63% and in islet cell tumors of 67%, 96%, 41%, 80%, 46%, 77%, and 68%, respectively. In all carcinoid patients (18)F-DOPA PET and (11)C-5-HTP PET detected more lesions than SRS (P < .001). (11)C-5-HTP PET was superior to (18)F-DOPA PET in islet cell tumors (P < .0001). In all cases, CT improved the sensitivity of the nuclear scans. CONCLUSION: (18)F-DOPA PET/CT is the optimal imaging modality for staging in carcinoid patients and (11)C-5-HTP PET/CT in islet cell tumor patients.
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare diagnostic sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in carcinoid and islet cell tumorpatients with a serotonin and a catecholamine precursor as tracers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Carcinoid (n = 24) or pancreatic islet cell tumor (n = 23) patients with at least one lesion on conventional imaging including somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) and computed tomography (CT) scan underwent (11)C-5-hydroxytryptophan ((11)C-5-HTP) PET and 6-[F-18]fluoro-L-dihydroxy-phenylalanine ((18)F-DOPA) PET. PET findings were compared with a composite reference standard derived from all available imaging along with clinical and cytologic/histologic information. RESULTS: In carcinoid tumorpatients, per-patient analysis showed sensitivities for (11)C-5-HTP PET, (18)F-DOPA PET, SRS, and CT of 100%, 96%, 86%, 96%, respectively, and in islet cell tumors of 100%, 89%, 78%, 87%, respectively. In carcinoidpatients, per-lesion analysis revealed sensitivities for (11)C-5-HTP PET, (11)C-5-HTP PET/CT, (18)F-DOPA PET, (18)F-DOPA PET/CT, SRS, SRS/CT, and CT alone of, respectively, 78%, 89%, 87%, 98%, 49%, 73%, and 63% and in islet cell tumors of 67%, 96%, 41%, 80%, 46%, 77%, and 68%, respectively. In all carcinoidpatients (18)F-DOPA PET and (11)C-5-HTP PET detected more lesions than SRS (P < .001). (11)C-5-HTP PET was superior to (18)F-DOPA PET in islet cell tumors (P < .0001). In all cases, CT improved the sensitivity of the nuclear scans. CONCLUSION: (18)F-DOPA PET/CT is the optimal imaging modality for staging in carcinoidpatients and (11)C-5-HTP PET/CT in islet cell tumorpatients.
Authors: Patrick Veit-Haibach; Marc Schiesser; Jan Soyka; Klaus Strobel; Niklaus G Schaefer; Rolf Hesselmann; P-A Clavien; Thomas F Hany Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-08-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Nikolaou; D Thomas; C Kampanellou; K Alexandraki; L G Andersson; A Sundin; G Kaltsas Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Jesus Fabregas; Tony N Talebi; Caio Rocha Lima; George N Sfakianakis; Philip Robinson; Alberto J Montero Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2011-06