Literature DB >> 18349392

Pharmacogenetic profiling for cetuximab plus irinotecan therapy in patients with refractory advanced colorectal cancer.

Francesco Graziano1, Annamaria Ruzzo, Fotios Loupakis, Emanuele Canestrari, Daniele Santini, Vincenzo Catalano, Renato Bisonni, Umberto Torresi, Irene Floriani, Gaia Schiavon, Francesca Andreoni, Paolo Maltese, Eliana Rulli, Bostjan Humar, Alfredo Falcone, Lucio Giustini, Giuseppe Tonini, Andrea Fontana, Gianluca Masi, Mauro Magnani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathways may play a relevant role in determining the activity of cetuximab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). We investigated possible associations between genetic variants and clinical outcomes of MCRC patients treated with cetuximab-irinotecan salvage therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent cetuximab-irinotecan salvage therapy after disease progression during or after first-line bolus/infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin chemotherapy and a second-line irinotecan-based regimen were considered eligible for analysis of polymorphisms with putative influence on cetuximab-related pathways. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) 61A>G, EGF receptor (EGFR) 216G>T, EGFR 497G>A, EGFR intron-1 (CA)(n) dinucleotide short (S)/long (L) variant, cyclin-D1 870A>G, immunoglobulin-G fragment-C receptors RIIIa 158G>T, and RIIa 131G>A were studied for a possible association with overall survival (OS) as the primary end point. Additional analyses were addressed at possible associations among polymorphisms and EGFR expression, toxicity, and response.
RESULTS: In 110 assessable patients, significant association with favorable OS was observed for EGFR intron-1 S/S and EGF 61 G/G genotypes. In the multivariate model, EGFR intron-1 S/S and EGF 61 G/G genotypes showed a hazard ratio of 0.41 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.78; P = .006) and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.84; P = .01), respectively. EGFR intron-1 S/S carriers showed more frequent G2-G3 skin toxicity (chi(2) test = 12.7; P = .001) and treatment response (chi(2) test = 9.45; P = .008) than EGFR intron-1 L/L carriers.
CONCLUSION: Although additional studies are required for confirmation, our findings could optimize the use of cetuximab in MCRC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349392     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  36 in total

1.  Accomplishments in 2008 in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Goldberg; Neal J Meropol; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09

2.  Combined assessment of EGFR-related molecules to predict outcome of 1st-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yu Sunakawa; Dongyun Yang; Miriana Moran; Stephanie H Astrow; Akihito Tsuji; Craig Stephens; Wu Zhang; Shu Cao; Takehiro Takahashi; Tadamichi Denda; Ken Shimada; Mitsugu Kochi; Masato Nakamura; Masahito Kotaka; Yoshihiko Segawa; Toshiki Masuishi; Masahiro Takeuchi; Masashi Fujii; Toshifusa Nakajima; Wataru Ichikawa; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  EGF61 polymorphism predicts complete pathologic response to cetuximab-based chemoradiation independent of KRAS status in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Daniel Vallbohmer; Wu Zhang; Dongyun Yang; Alexander Pohl; Melissa J Labonte; Peter P Grimminger; Arnulf H Hölscher; Robert Semrau; Dirk Arnold; Kathrin Dellas; Annelies Debucquoy; Karin Haustermans; Jean-Pascal H Machiels; Christine Sempoux; Claus Rödel; Matej Bracko; Vaneja Velenik; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Anti-HER agents in gastric cancer: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Lorenzo Fornaro; Maurizio Lucchesi; Chiara Caparello; Enrico Vasile; Sara Caponi; Laura Ginocchi; Gianluca Masi; Alfredo Falcone
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 5.  Toxicity as a biomarker of efficacy of molecular targeted therapies: focus on EGFR and VEGF inhibiting anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dienstmann; Irene Braña; Jordi Rodon; Josep Tabernero
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-12-01

6.  Polymorphism in epidermal growth factor is related to clinical outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoli Lu; Xiaowan Chen; Jingxu Sun; Peng Gao; Yongxi Song; Xuanzhang Huang; Yifan Luo; Ping Chen; Zhenning Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 7.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Marc Baay; Pol Specenier; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-28

8.  Efficacy of the monoclonal antibody EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Fakih; R Wong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor plus Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Dual Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Synergy or Antagonism?

Authors:  John L Marshall
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Improving Response Rates to EGFR-Targeted Therapies for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Candidate Predictive Biomarkers and Combination Treatment with Src Inhibitors.

Authors:  Ann Marie Egloff; Jennifer Rubin Grandis
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.