PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the reproducibility of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements obtained from the right and left carotid arteries in young adults by using ultrasonographic (US) images acquired at the maximum dimension, minimum dimension, and electrocardiographically (ECG)-triggered cardiac end diastole. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review board; all participants provided informed consent. Medical history, anthropometric measurements, and blood pressure (BP) values were obtained from 50 men and 50 women aged 18-25 years. Images of the common carotid arteries were acquired from three independent complete cardiac cycles by using a 15L8-MHz US transducer. CIMT was measured on the images of each cycle that depicted the narrowest and widest vessel diameters, and at the R wave of the ECG. Measurements from the right and left carotid arteries were analyzed by using paired t tests; possible sex differences, by using unpaired t tests. Reproducibility was determined by using coefficients of variation and intraclass correlations (ICCs). Pearson correlations and multiple regression analyses were used to compare CIMT, body mass index (BMI), and BP. RESULTS: CIMT values were 7.2% and 7% greater in frames showing the narrowest lumen diameter and in R-wave ECG-triggered frames, respectively, than in those with the widest diameter. CIMT measurements were 2.2%-3.1% greater in the right carotid artery than in the left (P < .001) and were significantly related to BMI (r = 0.40, P < .001) and systolic BP (r = 0.34, P < .001). ICCs were stronger when assessments were obtained in three different cardiac cycles (0.92-0.98), rather than in one (0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: In healthy young adults, reproducibility of CIMT measurements is greatest when combining values from both carotid arteries and/or from the maximal and minimal arterial diameters. (c) RSNA, 2008.
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the reproducibility of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) measurements obtained from the right and left carotid arteries in young adults by using ultrasonographic (US) images acquired at the maximum dimension, minimum dimension, and electrocardiographically (ECG)-triggered cardiac end diastole. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was HIPAA compliant and approved by the institutional review board; all participants provided informed consent. Medical history, anthropometric measurements, and blood pressure (BP) values were obtained from 50 men and 50 women aged 18-25 years. Images of the common carotid arteries were acquired from three independent complete cardiac cycles by using a 15L8-MHz US transducer. CIMT was measured on the images of each cycle that depicted the narrowest and widest vessel diameters, and at the R wave of the ECG. Measurements from the right and left carotid arteries were analyzed by using paired t tests; possible sex differences, by using unpaired t tests. Reproducibility was determined by using coefficients of variation and intraclass correlations (ICCs). Pearson correlations and multiple regression analyses were used to compare CIMT, body mass index (BMI), and BP. RESULTS:CIMT values were 7.2% and 7% greater in frames showing the narrowest lumen diameter and in R-wave ECG-triggered frames, respectively, than in those with the widest diameter. CIMT measurements were 2.2%-3.1% greater in the right carotid artery than in the left (P < .001) and were significantly related to BMI (r = 0.40, P < .001) and systolic BP (r = 0.34, P < .001). ICCs were stronger when assessments were obtained in three different cardiac cycles (0.92-0.98), rather than in one (0.79-0.91). CONCLUSION: In healthy young adults, reproducibility of CIMT measurements is greatest when combining values from both carotid arteries and/or from the maximal and minimal arterial diameters. (c) RSNA, 2008.
Authors: Lisa C Hudgins; Vidhya Annavajjhala; Arzu Kovanlikaya; Maura D Frank; Aliza Solomon; Thomas S Parker; Rubin S Cooper Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Anderson C Armstrong; Erin P Ricketts; Christopher Cox; Paul Adler; Alexander Arynchyn; Kiang Liu; Ellen Stengel; Stephen Sidney; Cora E Lewis; Pamela J Schreiner; James M Shikany; Kimberly Keck; Jamie Merlo; Samuel S Gidding; João A C Lima Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2014-11-09 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: M Consuelo Bastida-Jumilla; Rosa M Menchón-Lara; Juan Morales-Sánchez; Rafael Verdú-Monedero; Jorge Larrey-Ruiz; José Luis Sancho-Gómez Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: P-J Touboul; M G Hennerici; S Meairs; H Adams; P Amarenco; N Bornstein; L Csiba; M Desvarieux; S Ebrahim; R Hernandez Hernandez; M Jaff; S Kownator; T Naqvi; P Prati; T Rundek; M Sitzer; U Schminke; J-C Tardif; A Taylor; E Vicaut; K S Woo Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Jeffrey D Dawson; Milan Sonka; Mary Beth Blecha; Wenjiao Lin; Patricia H Davis Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 24.094