Literature DB >> 18349262

Survey of dairy management practices on one hundred thirteen north central and northeastern United States dairies.

W K Fulwider1, T Grandin, B E Rollin, T E Engle, N L Dalsted, W D Lamm.   

Abstract

The objective was to conduct a broad survey of dairy management practices that have an effect on animal well-being. Dairies were visited during the fall and winter of 2005 and 2006 in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Indiana, Iowa, and New York. Data were collected on 113 dairies on colostrum feeding, dehorning, tail-docking, euthanasia methods, producer statements about welfare, use of specialized calf-raising farms (custom), level of satisfaction with calf-raising by producers, and cow behavior. Calves were raised by the owner on 50.4% of dairies; 30.1% were raised on custom farms during the milk-feeding period, 18.6% were custom raised after weaning, and 1% sold calves with the option to buy them back as first-lactation heifers. A total of 51.8% of producers were very satisfied with their current calf-raising methods. Three feedings of colostrum were fed to the calves on 23.9% of dairies, 2 feedings on 39.8% of farms, 1 feeding on 31.0% of farms, and colostrum replacement products were fed on 5.3% of farms. Many farms (61.9%) provided 3.8 L at first feeding. Calves were dehorned at different ages by various methods. By 8 wk, 34.5% of calves were dehorned. By 12 wk, 78.8% of calves were dehorned. The majority of calves were dehorned by hot iron (67.3%). The remainder were dehorned by gouging (8.8%), paste (9.7%), saw (3.5%), or unknown by calf owner (10.6%). Anesthetic use was reported by 12.4% of dairy owners and analgesia use by 1.8%. Tail-docking was observed on 82.3% of dairies. The most common reported docking time was pre- or postcalving (35.2%). The second most commonly reported time was d 1 (15.4%). Rubber band was the most common method (92.5%), followed by amputation (7.5%). Three dairies amputated precalving, 1 at 2 mo and 3 at d 1 or 2. Cow hygiene was the most common reason given to dock (73.5%), followed by parlor worker comfort (17.4%) and udder health (1.0%). Producers reported 2.0% of cows obviously lame. Gun was the preferred euthanasia method (85.7%), followed by i.v. euthanasia (8.0%), live pick-up (1.8%), and nondisclosure (3.5%). Most producers (77.9%) stated that cows were in an improved environment as compared with 20 yr ago, whereas 8.0% stated conditions were worse, and 14.2% were undecided. Dairies with higher percentages of cows that either approached or touched the observer had lower somatic cell counts. The survey results showed management practices that were important for animal welfare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18349262     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of an online learning module to hands-on training in teaching a cautery disbudding technique for dairy calves including cornual nerve block application.

Authors:  Charlotte B Winder; Stephen J LeBlanc; Derek B Haley; Kerry D Lissemore; M Ann Godkin; Todd F Duffield
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  A survey of castration methods and associated livestock management practices performed by bovine veterinarians in the United States.

Authors:  Johann F Coetzee; Abbey L Nutsch; Laura A Barbur; Ryan M Bradburn
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Temporal kinetics of bovine mammary IgG secretion into colostrum and transition milk.

Authors:  Kasey M Schalich; Olivia M Reiff; Blake T Nguyen; Cassandra L Lamb; Cecilia R Mondoza; Vimal Selvaraj
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Pharmacokinetics and effect of intravenous meloxicam in weaned Holstein calves following scoop dehorning without local anesthesia.

Authors:  Johann F Coetzee; Ruby A Mosher; Butch KuKanich; Ronette Gehring; Brad Robert; J Brandon Reinbold; Brad J White
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 5.  Genetic selection for temperament traits in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  Marie J Haskell; Geoff Simm; Simon P Turner
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Maria J Hötzel; Cibele Longo; Lucas F Balcão; Clarissa S Cardoso; João H C Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Determination of Dairy Cattle Euthanasia Criteria and Analysis of Barriers to Humane Euthanasia in the United States: Dairy Producer Surveys and Focus Groups.

Authors:  Brooklyn K Wagner; Mary Caitlin Cramer; Heather N Fowler; Hannah L Varnell; Alia M Dietsch; Kathryn L Proudfoot; Jan Shearer; Maria Correa; Monique D Pairis-Garcia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.

Authors:  Paulo V Steagall; Hedie Bustamante; Craig B Johnson; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Experience with the delegation of anaesthesia for disbudding and castration to trained and certified livestock owners.

Authors:  Maher Alsaaod; Marcus G Doherr; Deborah Greber; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Sublingual administration of detomidine to calves prior to disbudding: a comparison with the intravenous route.

Authors:  Ann-Helena Hokkanen; Marja R Raekallio; Kati Salla; Laura Hänninen; Elina Viitasaari; Marianna Norring; Satu Raussi; Valtteri M Rinne; Mika Scheinin; Outi M Vainio
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.