Literature DB >> 18348478

The San Diego Immunization Survey: a model for local vaccination coverage assessment.

Jill C Daviva1, Wendy Wang, Kathe W Gustafson, Philip J Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Assessing vaccination coverage as part of a comprehensive intervention has been demonstrated to result in increased coverage rates. The National Immunization Survey provides coverage estimates at the national level and selected urban areas. However, it is important for other localities to understand vaccination coverage in their areas. The San Diego Immunization Branch conducts the San Diego Immunization Survey (SDIS) to gather vaccination coverage information in San Diego County. This article describes the methodology and results of the SDIS.
METHODS: The SDIS is a two-phase immunization survey. The first phase is a random-digit-dialing survey in which vaccination information is obtained by phone. The second phase involves the verification of this information and/or obtaining vaccination information via the registry or the child's provider(s).
RESULTS: In 2005, the sample size included 839 respondents. From 1995 to 2005, coverage for the following individual vaccines increased: diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, and acellular pertussis (92.0% to 96.5% for > or = 3 doses, and 75.0% to 89.0% for > or = 4 doses), polio (83.0% to 94.7%), measles-mumps-rubella (85.0% to 95.8%), Haemophilus influenzae type b (87.0% to 93.2%), and hepatitis B (67.0% to 93.6%).
CONCLUSION: The results of the SDIS demonstrate that San Diego County has exceeded the Healthy People 2010 goal to reach at least 80% coverage for the series of universally recommended vaccinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18348478      PMCID: PMC2099324          DOI: 10.1177/003335490812300106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  8 in total

1.  Recommendations regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Compensating for provider nonresponse using response propensities to form adjustment cells: the National Immunization Survey.

Authors:  P J Smith; J N Rao; M P Battaglia; T M Ezzati-Rice; D Daniels; M Khare
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2001-10

3.  Impact of measurement and feedback on vaccination coverage in public clinics, 1988-1994.

Authors:  C W LeBaron; M Chaney; A L Baughman; E F Dini; E Maes; V Dietz; R Bernier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage among children aged 19-35 months--United States, 2004.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Assessing immunization performance of private practitioners in Maine: impact of the assessment, feedback, incentives, and exchange strategy.

Authors:  M S Massoudi; J Walsh; S Stokley; J Rosenthal; J Stevenson; B Miljanovic; J Mann; E Dini
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices: programmatic strategies to increase vaccination rates--assessment and feedback of provider-based vaccination coverage information.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  A target-based model for increasing influenza immunizations in private practice. Genesee Hospital Medical Staff.

Authors:  J Buffington; K M Bell; F M LaForce
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Statistical methodology of the National Immunization Survey, 1994-2002.

Authors:  Philip J Smith; David C Hoaglin; Michael P Battaglia; Meena Khare; Lawrence E Barker
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2005-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.