BACKGROUND: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is the newest technique emerging in the field of surgery. There are several techniques described in the literature; however there is no standardization yet. We describe the transvaginal approach for endoscopic appendectomy in humans, probably the world's first report. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pneumoperitoneum was achieved via a Veress needle in the umbilicus. Routine 12-mm endoscope and routine instruments were used. Peritoneal access was gained via a transvaginal approach through the posterior fornix. RESULTS: Out of a total of six patients, a totally endoscopic transvaginal appendectomy was successfully performed for one patient. The other five patients were either converted to conventional laparoscopy or aided by a laparoscope. The average age of the patients was 29.5 years. The mean operating time was 103.5 min. Hospital stay was 1-2 days. The follow-ups were scheduled at 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 6 months. The vaginal wound was examined by the gynecologist and found to have completely healed during the first and second follow-up. DISCUSSION: So far in humans, transgastric appendectomy and cholecystectomy, and transvaginal cholecystectomy have been reported. A transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans has not been reported yet. The transvaginal approach provided a normal image of the target organ, unlike the inverted image of a transgastric approach caused by the inability to manipulate the scope outside the mouth. The technical ease of the procedure and early outcome seem satisfactory, although comparative studies are needed to confirm this.
BACKGROUND: Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is the newest technique emerging in the field of surgery. There are several techniques described in the literature; however there is no standardization yet. We describe the transvaginal approach for endoscopic appendectomy in humans, probably the world's first report. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pneumoperitoneum was achieved via a Veress needle in the umbilicus. Routine 12-mm endoscope and routine instruments were used. Peritoneal access was gained via a transvaginal approach through the posterior fornix. RESULTS: Out of a total of six patients, a totally endoscopic transvaginal appendectomy was successfully performed for one patient. The other five patients were either converted to conventional laparoscopy or aided by a laparoscope. The average age of the patients was 29.5 years. The mean operating time was 103.5 min. Hospital stay was 1-2 days. The follow-ups were scheduled at 7 days, 30 days, 90 days, and 6 months. The vaginal wound was examined by the gynecologist and found to have completely healed during the first and second follow-up. DISCUSSION: So far in humans, transgastric appendectomy and cholecystectomy, and transvaginal cholecystectomy have been reported. A transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans has not been reported yet. The transvaginal approach provided a normal image of the target organ, unlike the inverted image of a transgastric approach caused by the inability to manipulate the scope outside the mouth. The technical ease of the procedure and early outcome seem satisfactory, although comparative studies are needed to confirm this.
Authors: Anthony N Kalloo; Vikesh K Singh; Sanjay B Jagannath; Hideaki Niiyama; Susan L Hill; Cheryl A Vaughn; Carolyn A Magee; Sergey V Kantsevoy Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Estevao Lima; Carla Rolanda; José M Pêgo; Tiago Henriques-Coelho; David Silva; José L Carvalho; Jorge Correia-Pinto Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: S V Kantsevoy; B Hu; S B Jagannath; C A Vaughn; D M Beitler; S S C Chung; P B Cotton; C J Gostout; R H Hawes; P J Pasricha; C A Magee; L J Pipitone; M A Talamini; A N Kalloo Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2006-01-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Michael F McGee; Michael J Rosen; Jeffrey Marks; Raymond P Onders; Amitabh Chak; Ashley Faulx; Victor K Chen; Jeffrey Ponsky Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: Sanjay B Jagannath; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Cheryl A Vaughn; Sydney S C Chung; Peter B Cotton; Christopher J Gostout; Robert H Hawes; Pankaj J Pasricha; Diana G Scorpio; Carolyn A Magee; Laurie J Pipitone; Anthony N Kalloo Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: D Wilhelm; A Meining; S von Delius; A Fiolka; S Can; C Hann von Weyhern; A Schneider; H Feussner Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Peter Nau; E Christopher Ellison; Peter Muscarella; Dean Mikami; Vimal K Narula; Bradley Needleman; W Scott Melvin; Jeffrey W Hazey Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Luiz Henrique de Sousa; José Américo Gomides de Sousa; Luiz Henrique de Sousa Filho; Murilo Miranda de Sousa; Vitor Miranda de Sousa; Ana Patricia Miranda de Sousa; Ricardo Zorron Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Peter Nau; Joel Anderson; Benjamin Yuh; Peter Muscarella; E Christopher Ellison; Lynn Happel; Vimal K Narula; W Scott Melvin; Jeffrey W Hazey Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 4.584