Literature DB >> 1834765

Unaware learning versus preserved learning in pharmacologic amnesia: similarities and differences.

D Knopman1.   

Abstract

The differences between learning in lorazepam (LOR)--or scopolamine (SCOP)--induced amnesia and learning in unaware drug-free normal subjects were examined. The drugs produced impairment in free recall, but did not affect digit span or word retrieval. In a verbal version, but not a motor version, of the serial reaction time task, the subjects who received SCOP or higher dose LOR showed impairment of sequence-specific learning. Subjects who received placebo had no such impairment. In the stem completion paradigm, higher dose LOR, but not SCOP, impaired performance. In a tachistoscopic word identification task, neither drug interfered with repetition priming. Unaware learning and drug-induced amnesic learning were thus dissociable. These findings disconfirm the hypothesis that unaware learning and drug-induced amnesic learning are analogous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1834765     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.5.1017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  Pharmacological modulation of behavioral and neuronal correlates of repetition priming.

Authors:  C M Thiel; R N Henson; J S Morris; K J Friston; R J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The role of taxonomies in the study of human memory.

Authors:  D B Willingham; K Goedert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Impairment of contrast sensitivity in long-term lorazepam users.

Authors:  Anne Giersch; Claude Speeg-Schatz; Monique Tondre; Sylvaine Gottenkiene
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Midazolam does not inhibit association formation, just its storage and strengthening.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Iain Proctor; John R Anderson; Ferenc Gyulai; Joseph J Quinlan; Joyce M Oates
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of lorazepam and diazepam on conscious and automatic memory processes.

Authors:  P Vidailhet; M Kazès; J M Danion; F Kauffmann-Muller; D Grangé
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning.

Authors:  P A Frensch; C S Miner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

7.  Lorazepam and diazepam effects on memory acquisition in priming tasks.

Authors:  P Vidailhet; J M Danion; F Kauffmann-Muller; D Grangé; A Giersch; M van der Linden; J L Imbs
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Pharmacological models of memory dysfunction? A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and lorazepam on word valence ratings, priming and recall.

Authors:  F Schifano; H V Curran
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Encoding, remembering and awareness in lorazepam-induced amnesia.

Authors:  H V Curran; S Barrow; H Weingartner; M Lader; M Bernik
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Psychopharmacological analysis of implicit and explicit memory: a study with lorazepam and the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil.

Authors:  K I Bishop; H V Curran
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.