Literature DB >> 18347233

Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on satisfaction with appearance and quality of life.

Jason A Litner1, Brian W Rotenberg, Maureen Dennis, Peter A Adamson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess perioperative quality-of-life (QOL) changes in a facial plastic surgery patient population and to ascertain factors determinative of QOL changes. A notable paucity of objective scientific measurements of QOL exists within the facial plastic surgery literature.
METHODS: A 3-year prospective cohort study. The patient population, which comprised a consecutive series of patients 16 years or older, undergoing cosmetic nasal or facial surgery, was obtained from the senior author's (P.A.A.) private surgical practice. All patients presenting for surgery were offered participation. The main outcome measure was the 59-item Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59), a valid and reliable instrument assessing psychological distress associated with self-consciousness of facial appearance. Three patient score subgroupings were established: group 1, the DAS59 scores for all patients; group 2, the DAS59 score according to sex; and group 3, the DAS59 score according to the main surgical procedure. Surveys were administered to eligible patients at the final preoperative clinic visit and at 3 months after surgery. Data from the case-control groups were analyzed by a blinded statistician with appropriate t tests.
RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were enrolled with a 100% response rate (82 females [88%] and 11 males [12%]). The most common procedures were rhinoplasty (49%) and surgery for the aging face (51%). Marked differences in perioperative QOL were noted across all DAS59 domains for group 1 and for all females in group 2. Male patients in group 2 analysis experienced QOL improvement only from DAS59 domain 2 (General Self-consciousness of Facial Appearance). Rhinoplasty and surgery for the aging face improved patients' QOL but differed with respect to which DAS59 domains were affected.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life was enhanced by facial plastic surgery in this patient population. Male and female patients seem to have different needs to be met from facial cosmetic surgery and correspondingly different areas of improvement in QOL. Rhinoplasty and surgery for the aging face act on different domains of QOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18347233     DOI: 10.1001/archfaci.10.2.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  10 in total

1.  Health-Related Quality of Life of Persons after Rhinoplasty: A Longitudinal Study among Iranian Population.

Authors:  Kazem Hosseinzadeh; Hamid Hamadzadeh; Mansour Khorasani; Maryam Jamshidi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

2.  The impact of reconstructive procedures following bariatric surgery on patient well-being and quality of life.

Authors:  Eva S J van der Beek; Wouter Te Riele; Tom F Specken; Djamila Boerma; Bert van Ramshorst
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Comprehensive assessment in cosmetic rhinoplasty: The use of the Derriford Appearance Scale for evaluation of patients.

Authors:  Uma Patnaik; Ajith Nilakantan; Ram Bajpai; Kalyani Addya
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2018-10-25

Review 4.  What is Beauty?

Authors:  Andrea Sisti; Payam Sadeghi; Negaar Aryan
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  When Aesthetics, Surgery, and Psychology Meet: Aesthetic Nasal Proportions in Patients Having Rhinoplasty and Normal Adults.

Authors:  Mohsen Naraghi; Mohammad Atari; Hossein Asadollahi
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-24

6.  A Comparison of Doctor/Patient Satisfaction with Aesthetic Outcomes of Rhinoplasty: a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Rezaei; Farzad Rezaei; Hoshyar Abbasi; Hamed Moradi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

7.  How to predict the outcome of septorhinoplasty? A normative study of ROE and FROI-17 scores.

Authors:  Michaela Plath; Matthias Sand; Carlo Cavaliere; Peter K Plinkert; Ingo Baumann; Karim Zaoui
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Self-Consciousness of Appearance in Chinese Patients With Cleft Lip: Validation of the Chinese Derriford Appearance Scale 59 (DAS 59) Instrument.

Authors:  Karim A Sakran; Sixing Song; Huo Li; Peiyue Pan; Nan Chen; Ni Zeng; Ting Chi; Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang; Yan Wang; Caixia Gong
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.418

9.  Quality of Life and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dreher; Carolina Blaya; Juliana L C Tenório; Renato Saltz; Pedro B Ely; Ygor A Ferrão
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-09-15

10.  Crooked nose: outcome evaluations in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Lisandra Megumi Arima; Leandro Castro Velasco; Romualdo Suzano Louzeiro Tiago
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.