Monica R Maly1, Patrick A Costigan, Sandra J Olney. 1. 1408 Elborn College, School of Physical Therapy, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1. mmaly@uwo.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pain experienced by people with knee osteoarthritis is related to psychosocial factors and damage to articular tissues and/or the pain pathway itself. Mechanical factors have been speculated to trigger this pain experience; yet mechanics have not been identified as a source of pain in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify whether mechanics could explain variance in pain intensity in people with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Data from 53 participants with physician-diagnosed knee osteoarthritis (mean age=68.5 years; standard deviation=8.6 years) were analyzed. Pain intensity was reported on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Mechanical measures included weight-bearing varus-valgus alignment, body mass index and isokinetic quadriceps torque. Gait analysis captured the range of adduction-abduction angle, range of flexion-extension angle and external knee adduction moment during level walking. FINDINGS: Pain intensity was significantly related to the dynamic range of flexion-extension during gait and body mass index. A total of 29% of the variance in pain intensity was explained by mechanical variables. The range of flexion-extension explained 18% of variance in pain intensity. Body mass index added 11% to the model. The knee adduction moment was unrelated to pain intensity. INTERPRETATION: The findings support that mechanical factors are related to knee osteoarthritis pain. Because limitations in flexion-extension range of motion and body size are modifiable factors, future research could examine whether interventions targeting these mechanics would facilitate pain management.
BACKGROUND:Pain experienced by people with knee osteoarthritis is related to psychosocial factors and damage to articular tissues and/or the pain pathway itself. Mechanical factors have been speculated to trigger this pain experience; yet mechanics have not been identified as a source of pain in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify whether mechanics could explain variance in pain intensity in people with knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Data from 53 participants with physician-diagnosed knee osteoarthritis (mean age=68.5 years; standard deviation=8.6 years) were analyzed. Pain intensity was reported on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Mechanical measures included weight-bearing varus-valgus alignment, body mass index and isokinetic quadriceps torque. Gait analysis captured the range of adduction-abduction angle, range of flexion-extension angle and external knee adduction moment during level walking. FINDINGS:Pain intensity was significantly related to the dynamic range of flexion-extension during gait and body mass index. A total of 29% of the variance in pain intensity was explained by mechanical variables. The range of flexion-extension explained 18% of variance in pain intensity. Body mass index added 11% to the model. The knee adduction moment was unrelated to pain intensity. INTERPRETATION: The findings support that mechanical factors are related to knee osteoarthritis pain. Because limitations in flexion-extension range of motion and body size are modifiable factors, future research could examine whether interventions targeting these mechanics would facilitate pain management.
Authors: N A Segal; M C Nevitt; R D Welborn; U-S D T Nguyen; J Niu; C E Lewis; D T Felson; L Frey-Law Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Kushang V Patel; Elizabeth A Phelan; Suzanne G Leveille; Sarah E Lamb; Celestin Missikpode; Robert B Wallace; Jack M Guralnik; Dennis C Turk Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kim L Bennell; Kelly-Ann Bowles; Craig Payne; Flavia Cicuttini; Elizabeth Williamson; Andrew Forbes; Fahad Hanna; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Anthony Harris; Rana S Hinman Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-05-18