BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate arterial recanalization as measured by changes in the presence of hyperdense artery sign (HAS) on initial and 24-hour computed tomography scans in patients treated withrecombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or placebo, and to assess the effect of rt-PA on patient outcomes in this population. METHODS:Patients in the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rt-PA Stroke Trial composed the study group. We determined the percentage of patients with HAS in rt-PA- and placebo-treated groups who had persistence (HAS +/+) or resolution (HAS +/-) of HAS on 24-hour computed tomography, and compared outcomes in those with resolution or persistence of the sign in these treatment groups. RESULTS:Baseline HAS occurred in 79 of 604 eligible patients (13%). The two treatment groups were similar, although patients treated with rt-PA were significantly older. Of the 79 patients with HAS onbaseline computed tomography scan, 14 of 37 (38%) treated with rt-PA had resolution of HAS at 24 hours compared with 7 of 42 (17%) treated with placebo (P = .03). Infarct volumes at 24 hours were significantly smaller in patients treated with rt-PA with resolution of the sign, compared with those who had persistence of the sign (P = .004). In our analysis, functional outcomes were not significantly improved based on resolution of HAS in either treatment group. There were 4 symptomatic ICHs in the rt-PA-treated group with HAS as compared with two in the placebo-treated group. CONCLUSION: Among patients with HAS at baseline in the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial, intravenous rt-PA increased recanalization as measured by resolution of HAS and reduced infarct volumes at 24 hours.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate arterial recanalization as measured by changes in the presence of hyperdense artery sign (HAS) on initial and 24-hour computed tomography scans in patients treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) or placebo, and to assess the effect of rt-PA on patient outcomes in this population. METHODS:Patients in the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rt-PA Stroke Trial composed the study group. We determined the percentage of patients with HAS in rt-PA- and placebo-treated groups who had persistence (HAS +/+) or resolution (HAS +/-) of HAS on 24-hour computed tomography, and compared outcomes in those with resolution or persistence of the sign in these treatment groups. RESULTS: Baseline HAS occurred in 79 of 604 eligible patients (13%). The two treatment groups were similar, although patients treated with rt-PA were significantly older. Of the 79 patients with HAS on baseline computed tomography scan, 14 of 37 (38%) treated with rt-PA had resolution of HAS at 24 hours compared with 7 of 42 (17%) treated with placebo (P = .03). Infarct volumes at 24 hours were significantly smaller in patients treated with rt-PA with resolution of the sign, compared with those who had persistence of the sign (P = .004). In our analysis, functional outcomes were not significantly improved based on resolution of HAS in either treatment group. There were 4 symptomatic ICHs in the rt-PA-treated group with HAS as compared with two in the placebo-treated group. CONCLUSION: Among patients with HAS at baseline in the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial, intravenous rt-PA increased recanalization as measured by resolution of HAS and reduced infarct volumes at 24 hours.
Authors: A Furlan; R Higashida; L Wechsler; M Gent; H Rowley; C Kase; M Pessin; A Ahuja; F Callahan; W M Clark; F Silver; F Rivera Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-12-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A V Alexandrov; A M Demchuk; R A Felberg; I Christou; P A Barber; W S Burgin; M Malkoff; A W Wojner; J C Grotta Journal: Stroke Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S C Patel; S R Levine; B C Tilley; J C Grotta; M Lu; M Frankel; E C Haley; T G Brott; J P Broderick; S Horowitz; P D Lyden; C A Lewandowski; J R Marler; K M Welch Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-12-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrei V Alexandrov; Andrew M Demchuk; W Scott Burgin; David J Robinson; James C Grotta Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Carlos A Molina; José Alvarez-Sabín; Joan Montaner; Sonia Abilleira; Juan F Arenillas; Pilar Coscojuela; Francisco Romero; Agusti Codina Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: T A Tomsick; P Khatri; T Jovin; B Demaerschalk; T Malisch; A Demchuk; M D Hill; E Jauch; J Spilker; J P Broderick Journal: Neurology Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Grant Mair; Rüdiger von Kummer; Zoe Morris; Anders von Heijne; Nick Bradey; Lesley Cala; André Peeters; Andrew J Farrall; Alessandro Adami; Gillian Potter; Geoff Cohen; Peter A G Sandercock; Richard I Lindley; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-12-09 Impact factor: 9.910