Literature DB >> 18345834

The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places?

Robert Pheasant1, Kirill Horoshenkov, Greg Watts, Brendan Barrett.   

Abstract

Prior to this work no structured mechanism existed in the UK to evaluate the tranquillity of open spaces with respect to the characteristics of both acoustic and visual stimuli. This is largely due to the fact that within the context of "tranquil" environments, little is known about the interaction of the audio-visual modalities and how they combine to lead to the perception of tranquillity. This paper presents the findings of a study in which visual and acoustic data, captured from 11 English rural and urban landscapes, were used by 44 volunteers to make subjective assessments of both their perceived tranquillity of a location, and the loudness of five generic soundscape components. The results were then analyzed alongside objective measurements taken in the laboratory. It was found that the maximum sound pressure level (L(Amax)) and the percentage of natural features present at a location were the key factors influencing tranquillity. Engineering formulas for the tranquillity as a function of the noise level and proportion of the natural features are proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18345834     DOI: 10.1121/1.2831735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Quiet areas and the need for quietness in Amsterdam.

Authors:  Hester Booi; Frits van den Berg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Categorization of natural dynamic audiovisual scenes.

Authors:  Olli Rummukainen; Jenni Radun; Toni Virtanen; Ville Pulkki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  On-site and laboratory evaluations of soundscape quality in recreational urban spaces.

Authors:  Lærke C Bjerre; Thea M Larsen; A Josefine Sørensen; Sébastien Santurette; Cheol-Ho Jeong
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  Motorized Recreation Sounds Influence Nature Scene Evaluations: The Role of Attitude Moderators.

Authors:  Jacob Benfield; B D Taff; David Weinzimmer; Peter Newman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-13

5.  Public Space Users' Soundscape Evaluations in Relation to Their Activities. An Amsterdam-Based Study.

Authors:  Edda Bild; Karin Pfeffer; Matt Coler; Ori Rubin; Luca Bertolini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-29

6.  Influence of Personal Factors on Sound Perception and Overall Experience in Urban Green Areas. A Case Study of a Cycling Path Highly Exposed to Road Traffic Noise.

Authors:  Francesco Aletta; Timothy Van Renterghem; Dick Botteldooren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  On the Person-Place Interaction and Its Relationship with the Responses/Outcomes of Listeners of Urban Soundscape (Compared Cases of Lisbon and Bogotá): Contextual and Semiotic Aspects.

Authors:  Luis Hermida; Ignacio Pavón; Antonio Carlos Lobo Soares; J Luis Bento-Coelho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Listening to Japanese Gardens: An Autoethnographic Study on the Soundscape Action Design Tool.

Authors:  Gunnar Cerwén
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  How pleasant sounds promote and annoying sounds impede health: a cognitive approach.

Authors:  Tjeerd C Andringa; J Jolie L Lanser
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Towards an Urban Vibrancy Model: A Soundscape Approach.

Authors:  Francesco Aletta; Jian Kang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.