Literature DB >> 18344518

Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.

Meaza Demissie1, Barbara Mascialino, Stefano Calza, Yudi Pawitan.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: In searching for differentially expressed (DE) genes in microarray data, we often observe a fraction of the genes to have unequal variability between groups. This is not an issue in large samples, where a valid test exists that uses individual variances separately. The problem arises in the small-sample setting, where the approximately valid Welch test lacks sensitivity, while the more sensitive moderated t-test assumes equal variance.
METHODS: We introduce a moderated Welch test (MWT) that allows unequal variance between groups. It is based on (i) weighting of pooled and unpooled standard errors and (ii) improved estimation of the gene-level variance that exploits the information from across the genes.
RESULTS: When a non-trivial proportion of genes has unequal variability, false discovery rate (FDR) estimates based on the standard t and moderated t-tests are often too optimistic, while the standard Welch test has low sensitivity. The MWT is shown to (i) perform better than the standard t, the standard Welch and the moderated t-tests when the variances are unequal between groups and (ii) perform similarly to the moderated t, and better than the standard t and Welch tests when the group variances are equal. These results mean that MWT is more reliable than other existing tests over wider range of data conditions. AVAILABILITY: R package to perform MWT is available at http://www.meb.ki.se/~yudpaw

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18344518     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  7 in total

1.  Gene expression in teratogenic exposures: a new approach to understanding individual risk.

Authors:  Claudia Kappen; J Michael Salbaum
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Integrating mean and variance heterogeneities to identify differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Weiwei Ouyang; Qiang An; Jinying Zhao; Huaizhen Qin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Ranking metrics in gene set enrichment analysis: do they matter?

Authors:  Joanna Zyla; Michal Marczyk; January Weiner; Joanna Polanska
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  An oil containing EPA and DHA from transgenic Camelina sativa to replace marine fish oil in feeds for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): Effects on intestinal transcriptome, histology, tissue fatty acid profiles and plasma biochemistry.

Authors:  Mónica B Betancor; Keshuai Li; Matthew Sprague; Tora Bardal; Olga Sayanova; Sarah Usher; Lihua Han; Kjell Måsøval; Ole Torrissen; Johnathan A Napier; Douglas R Tocher; Rolf Erik Olsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Computational systems biology approaches for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Enrico Glaab
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.249

6.  Gene set enrichment for reproducible science: comparison of CERNO and eight other algorithms.

Authors:  Joanna Zyla; Michal Marczyk; Teresa Domaszewska; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Joanna Polanska; January Weiner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Network analysis of functional genomics data: application to avian sex-biased gene expression.

Authors:  Oliver Frings; Judith E Mank; Andrey Alexeyenko; Erik L L Sonnhammer
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.