UNLABELLED: Several lines of evidence demonstrate involvement of serotonin 1A receptors (5-HT1ARs) in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression, suicidal behavior, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. We recently published the synthesis and initial evaluation of [O-methyl-11C]2-(4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-triazine-3,5(2H,4H)dione (11C-MMP), a 5-HT1AR agonist. Here we determine the optimal modeling parameters for 11C-MMP under its new name, 11C-CUMI-101, in Papio anubis. METHODS: PET scans were performed on 2 adult male P. anubis; 166.5 MBq +/- 43.0 (4.50 +/- 1.16 mCi) of 11C-CUMI-101 were injected as an intravenous bolus, and emission data were collected for 120 min in 3-dimensional mode. We evaluated 4 different models (1- and 2-tissue compartment iterative and noniterative kinetic models, basis pursuit, and likelihood estimation in graphical analysis [LEGA]), using binding potential (BPF = Bmax/Kd) (Bmax = maximum number of binding sites; Kd = dissociation constant) as the outcome measure. Arterial blood sampling and metabolite-corrected arterial input function were used for full quantification of BPF. To assess the performance of each model, we compared results using 6 different metrics (percentage difference, within-subject mean sum of squares [WSMSS] for reproducibility; variance across subjects, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] for reliability; identifiability based on bootstrap resampling of residuals; and time stability analysis to determine minimal required scanning time) at each of 6 different scanning durations. Models were also evaluated on scans acquired after injecting the 5-HT1A antagonist [N-(2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide] [WAY100635] 0.5 mg/kg, intravenous) and the 5-HT1A agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin) [8-OH-DPAT] 2 mg/kg, intravenous). RESULTS: All metabolites are more polar than 11C-CUMI-101, and no significant change in metabolites was observed in the blocking studies. The free fraction is 59% +/- 3%. We determined that 100 min of scanning time is adequate and that for the region-of-interest (ROI)-level analysis, the LEGA model gives the best results. The median test-retest percentage difference for BPF is 11.15% +/- 4.82% across all regions, WSMSS = 2.66, variance = 6.07, ICC = 0.43, and bootstrap identifiability = 0.59. Preadministration of WAY100635 and 8-OH-DPAT resulted in 87% and 76% average reductions in BPF values, respectively, across ROIs. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the measurable free fraction, high affinity and selectivity, adequate blood-brain permeability, and favorable plasma and brain kinetics, 11C-CUMI-101 is an excellent candidate for imaging high-affinity 5-HT1ARs in humans.
UNLABELLED: Several lines of evidence demonstrate involvement of serotonin 1A receptors (5-HT1ARs) in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression, suicidal behavior, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. We recently published the synthesis and initial evaluation of [O-methyl-11C]2-(4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-triazine-3,5(2H,4H)dione (11C-MMP), a 5-HT1AR agonist. Here we determine the optimal modeling parameters for 11C-MMP under its new name, 11C-CUMI-101, in Papio anubis. METHODS: PET scans were performed on 2 adult male P. anubis; 166.5 MBq +/- 43.0 (4.50 +/- 1.16 mCi) of 11C-CUMI-101 were injected as an intravenous bolus, and emission data were collected for 120 min in 3-dimensional mode. We evaluated 4 different models (1- and 2-tissue compartment iterative and noniterative kinetic models, basis pursuit, and likelihood estimation in graphical analysis [LEGA]), using binding potential (BPF = Bmax/Kd) (Bmax = maximum number of binding sites; Kd = dissociation constant) as the outcome measure. Arterial blood sampling and metabolite-corrected arterial input function were used for full quantification of BPF. To assess the performance of each model, we compared results using 6 different metrics (percentage difference, within-subject mean sum of squares [WSMSS] for reproducibility; variance across subjects, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] for reliability; identifiability based on bootstrap resampling of residuals; and time stability analysis to determine minimal required scanning time) at each of 6 different scanning durations. Models were also evaluated on scans acquired after injecting the 5-HT1A antagonist [N-(2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethyl)-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide] [WAY100635] 0.5 mg/kg, intravenous) and the 5-HT1A agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin) [8-OH-DPAT] 2 mg/kg, intravenous). RESULTS: All metabolites are more polar than 11C-CUMI-101, and no significant change in metabolites was observed in the blocking studies. The free fraction is 59% +/- 3%. We determined that 100 min of scanning time is adequate and that for the region-of-interest (ROI)-level analysis, the LEGA model gives the best results. The median test-retest percentage difference for BPF is 11.15% +/- 4.82% across all regions, WSMSS = 2.66, variance = 6.07, ICC = 0.43, and bootstrap identifiability = 0.59. Preadministration of WAY100635 and 8-OH-DPAT resulted in 87% and 76% average reductions in BPF values, respectively, across ROIs. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the measurable free fraction, high affinity and selectivity, adequate blood-brain permeability, and favorable plasma and brain kinetics, 11C-CUMI-101 is an excellent candidate for imaging high-affinity 5-HT1ARs in humans.
Authors: J Logan; J S Fowler; N D Volkow; A P Wolf; S L Dewey; D J Schlyer; R R MacGregor; R Hitzemann; B Bendriem; S J Gatley Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 1990-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: H Blair Simpson; Ilise Lombardo; Mark Slifstein; Henry Yiyun Huang; Dah Ren Hwang; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Michael R Liebowitz; Marc Laruelle Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: J J Mann; P A McBride; R P Brown; M Linnoila; A C Leon; M DeMeo; T Mieczkowski; J E Myers; M Stanley Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1992-06
Authors: T Jolas; R Schreiber; A M Laporte; M Chastanet; J De Vry; T Glaser; J Adrien; M Hamon Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Rajesh Narendran; Dah-Ren Hwang; Mark Slifstein; Peter S Talbot; David Erritzoe; Yiyun Huang; Thomas B Cooper; Diana Martinez; Lawrence S Kegeles; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Marc Laruelle Journal: Synapse Date: 2004-06-01 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: J S Dileep Kumar; Jaya Prabhakaran; Vattoly J Majo; Matthew S Milak; Shu-Chi Hsiung; Hadassah Tamir; Norman R Simpson; Ronald L Van Heertum; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-01-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Rajapillai L I Pillai; Elizabeth A Bartlett; Mala R Ananth; Chencan Zhu; Jie Yang; Greg Hajcak; Ramin V Parsey; Christine DeLorenzo Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: J S Dileep Kumar; Ramin V Parsey; Suham A Kassir; Vattoly J Majo; Matthew S Milak; Jaya Prabhakaran; Norman R Simpson; Mark D Underwood; J John Mann; Victoria Arango Journal: Brain Res Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: J S Dileep Kumar; Mark D Underwood; Norman R Simpson; Suham A Kassir; Jaya Prabhakaran; Vattoly J Majo; Mihran J Bakalian; Ramin V Parsey; J John Mann; Victoria Arango Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2016-03-13 Impact factor: 4.345